Observational studyMedical care2018
Diffusion of Bevacizumab Across Oncology Practices: An Observational Study.
Observational study in Medical care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Barriers and facilitators to the uptake of new medicines into clinical practice: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2021Pooled it
- The Oncology Care Model and Initiation of Systemic Therapy for Cancer.JAMA internal medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- How often do oncologists receive industry payments from competing companies?The oncologist · 2026Article
- Provider billing margin and cancer treatment selection: population based cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
- Off-Label Use of First-Line Immunotherapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.Clinical genitourinary cancer · 2025Article
- Race and Ethnicity and Diffusion of Telemedicine in Medicaid for Schizophrenia Care After Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Commercial Versus Medicaid Insurance and Use of High-Priced Anticancer Treatments.The oncologist · 2024Article
- Practice-Level Variation in Molecular Testing and Use of Targeted Therapy for Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Colorectal Cancer.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- How are new drugs disseminated in Japan? Analysis using the National Database of Health Insurance Claims of Japan.Cancer science · 2022Article
- Article
- Assessment of Second-Generation Diabetes Medication Initiation Among Medicare Enrollees From 2007 to 2015.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Association of Physician Peer Influence With Subsequent Physician Adoption and Use of Bevacizumab.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Adoption of immunotherapy in the community for patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2019Article
- Aggressive Care near the End of Life for Cancer Patients in Medicare Accountable Care Organizations.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTechnological advances can improve care and outcomes but are a primary driver of health care spending growth. Understanding diffusion and use of new oncology therapies is important, given substantial increases in prices and spending on such treatments.
objectivesExamine diffusion of bevacizumab, a novel (in 2004) and high-priced biologic cancer therapy, among US oncology practices during 2005-2012 and assess variation in use across practices. RESEARCH
designPopulation-based observational study.
settingA total of 2329 US practices providing cancer chemotherapy.
participantsRandom 20% sample of 236,304 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged above 65 years in 2004-2012 undergoing infused chemotherapy for cancer. MEASURES: Diffusion of bevacizumab (cumulative time to first use and 10% use) in practices, variation in use across practices overall and by higher versus lower-value use. We used hierarchical models with practice random effects to estimate the between-practice variation in the probability of receiving bevacizumab and to identify factors associated with use.
resultsWe observed relatively rapid diffusion of bevacizumab, particularly in independent practices and larger versus smaller practices. We observed substantial variation in use; the adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of bevacizumab use was 2.90 higher (2.73-3.08) for practices 1 SD above versus one standard deviation below the mean. Variation was less for higher-value [odds ratio=2.72 (2.56-2.89)] than lower-value uses [odds ratio=3.61 (3.21-4.06)].
conclusionsUse of bevacizumab varied widely across oncology practices, particularly for lower-value indications. These findings suggest that interventions targeted to practices have potential for decreasing low-value use of high-cost cancer therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.