Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29135410›Full record

ReviewInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Tissue-based molecular markers in upper tract urothelial carcinoma and their prognostic implications.

Ricardo L Favaretto, Stênio C Zequi, Renato A R Oliveira, Thiago Santana, Walter H Costa, Isabela W Cunha, Gustavo C Guimarães

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Proteomic research and diagnosis in bladder cancer: state of the art review.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ricardo L FavarettoDepartamento de Cirurgia Pélvica, Serviço de Urologia AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brasil, São Paulo, Brasil.
Stênio C ZequiDepartamento de Cirurgia Pélvica, Serviço de Urologia AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brasil, São Paulo, Brasil.
Renato A R OliveiraDepartamento de Cirurgia Pélvica, Serviço de Urologia AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brasil, São Paulo, Brasil.
Thiago SantanaDepartamento de Cirurgia Pélvica, Serviço de Urologia AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brasil, São Paulo, Brasil.
Walter H CostaDepartamento de Cirurgia Pélvica, Serviço de Urologia AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brasil, São Paulo, Brasil.
Isabela W CunhaDepartamento de Patologia, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brasil.
Gustavo C GuimarãesDepartamento de Cirurgia Pélvica, Serviço de Urologia AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brasil, São Paulo, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare and aggressive disease that is associated with high rates of recurrence and death. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with excision of the bladder cuff is considered the standard of care for high-risk UTUC, whereas kidney-sparing techniques can be indicated for select patients with low-risk disease. There is a significant lack of clinical and pathological prognostic factors for stratifying patients with regard to making treatment decisions. Incorporation of tissue-based molecular markers into prognostic tools could help accurately stratify patients for clinical decision-making in this heterogeneous disease. Although the number of studies on tissue-based markers in UTUC has risen dramatically in the past several years-many of which are based on single centers and small cohorts, with a low level of evidence-many discrepancies remain between their results. Nevertheless, certain biomarkers are promising tools, necessitating prospective multi-institution studies to validate their function.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNephroureterectomyPrognosisSensitivity and SpecificityUrologic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkersCarcinomaPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID29135410
PMCPMC5815529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.