ArticleBreastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine
Cognitive Testing of the Brief Breastfeeding and Milk Expression Recall Survey.
Article in Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reliability of Maternal Recall of Feeding at the Breast and Breast Milk Expression 6 Years After Delivery.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2020Article
- Improved Estimation of Breastfeeding Rates Using a Novel Breastfeeding and Milk Expression Survey.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMajor U.S. federal maternal and child health surveys collect an infant feeding history for children under 6 years of age using survey questions that have changed little over decades. Yet, infant feeding and lactation practices have changed with the increasing popularity of milk expression (pumping). SUBJECTS AND
methodsCognitive interviews were conducted to test the 9-item Brief Breastfeeding and Milk Expression Recall Survey (BaByMERS) with a diverse sample of 15 U.S. mothers of children 1-5 years of age. A 42-item coding scheme was applied to identify interviewer and respondent problems in fielding and answering the questions. Problems were examined in relation to demographics and infant feeding and lactation history.
resultsThe extent of problems was modest. Of 42 possible problem codes, only 9 were identified as actual problems for one or more respondents on one or more questions. The most common problems involved uncertainty about the timing of when one started expressing milk, making a mental shift to realize that maternal milk expression and the child's consumption of that milk could be distinct concepts, and difficulty with certain terms or phrases. Problems tended to arise among mothers with more complex infant feeding or lactation histories, who also tended to be those with higher levels of education.
conclusionsBaByMERS is a promising, brief tool for collecting a recalled infant feeding or lactation history among mothers with young children. Future research can evaluate additional characteristics of the tool to further confirm its utility for large epidemiological studies of maternal and child health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.