Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29134673›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2018

Modified dixon-based renal dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI facilitates automated registration and perfusion analysis.

Anneloes de Boer, Tim Leiner, Eva E Vink, Peter J Blankestijn, Cornelis A T van den Berg

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Multiparametric Renal MRI: An Intrasubject Test-Retest Repeatability Study.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Decreased native renal TJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. [The research and application advances of medical imaging techniques in early renal function assessment of chronic kidney disease].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anneloes de BoerUtrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Tim LeinerUtrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eva E VinkUtrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Peter J BlankestijnUtrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Cornelis A T van den BergUtrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRenal dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI provides information on renal perfusion and filtration. However, clinical implementation is hampered by challenges in postprocessing as a result of misalignment of the kidneys due to respiration. We propose to perform automated image registration using the fat-only images derived from a modified Dixon reconstruction of a dual-echo acquisition because these provide consistent contrast over the dynamic series.

methodsDCE data of 10 hypertensive patients was used. Dual-echo images were acquired at 1.5 T with temporal resolution of 3.9 s during contrast agent injection. Dixon fat, water, and in-phase and opposed-phase (OP) images were reconstructed. Postprocessing was automated. Registration was performed both to fat images and OP images for comparison. Perfusion and filtration values were extracted from a two-compartment model fit.

resultsAutomatic registration to fat images performed better than automatic registration to OP images with visible contrast enhancement. Median vertical misalignment of the kidneys was 14 mm prior to registration, compared to 3 mm and 5 mm with registration to fat images and OP images, respectively (P = 0.03). Mean perfusion values and MR-based glomerular filtration rates (GFR) were 233 ± 64 mL/100 mL/min and 60 ± 36 mL/minute, respectively, based on fat-registered images. MR-based GFR correlated with creatinine-based GFR (P = 0.04) for fat-registered images. For unregistered and OP-registered images, this correlation was not significant.

conclusionAbsence of contrast changes on Dixon fat images improves registration in renal DCE MRI and enables automated postprocessing, resulting in a more accurate estimation of GFR. Magn Reson Med 80:66-76, 2018. © 2017 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsContrast MediaCreatinineFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHematocritHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKidneyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPerfusionReproducibility of ResultsContrast MediaCreatinineautomated postprocessingDCE MRIDixonkidneyperfusion contrast agentregistration

Identifiers

PMID29134673
PMCPMC5900902
OpenAlexW2770947107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.