Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29134629›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2018

Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Dementia Risk: Prospective Population-Based Study.

Shelly L Gray, Rod L Walker, Sascha Dublin, Onchee Yu, Erin J Aiello Bowles, Melissa L Anderson, Paul K Crane, Eric B Larson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Innovations in pharmacovigilance studies of medicines in older people.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Medication Exposure and Risk of Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shelly L GraySchool of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Rod L WalkerKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Sascha DublinKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Onchee YuKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Erin J Aiello BowlesKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Melissa L AndersonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Paul K CraneDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Eric B LarsonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Furthering scientific understanding of mechanisms underlying resilience to the effects of AD pathology by incorporating state of the art quantification of gliosis, inflammation, & synaptic toxicityU01AG006781 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CRANE, PAUL K, LARSON, ERIC B · 1986 to 2020
$39.3M
Computational modeling of gene regulatory networks in cell differentiationZ01AG000678 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI KO, MINORU · 2008 to 2008
$286k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 AG000678NIA NIH HHS U01 AG006781
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether higher cumulative proton pump inhibitor (PPI) exposure is associated with greater dementia risk.

designProspective population-based cohort study.

settingKaiser Permanente Washington, an integrated healthcare delivery system in Seattle, Washington.

participantsIndividuals aged 65 and older without dementia at study entry (N = 3,484). MEASUREMENTS: Participants were screened for dementia every 2 years, and those who screened positive underwent extensive evaluation. Dementia outcomes were determined using standard diagnostic criteria. Time-varying PPI exposure was determined from computerized pharmacy data and consisted of total standardized daily doses (TSDDs) dispensed to an individual in the prior 10 years. We also assessed duration of use. Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate the association between PPI exposure and time to dementia or Alzheimer's disease (AD).

resultsOver a mean follow-up of 7.5 years, 827 participants (23.7%) developed dementia (670 with possible or probable AD). PPI exposure was not associated with risk of dementia (P = .66) or AD (P = .77). For dementia, the risk for specific levels of cumulative exposure compared to no use was: 365 TSDDs (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.65-1.18), 1,095 TSDDs (HR 0.99, CI 0.75-1.30) and 1,825 TSDDs (HR 1.13, CI 0.82-1.56). These TSDD levels represent approximately 1, 3 and 5 years of daily use respectively. Duration of PPI use was not associated with dementia outcomes either.

conclusionProton pump inhibitor use was not associated with dementia risk, even for people with high cumulative exposure. Although there are other safety concerns with long-term PPI use, results from our study do not support that these medications should be avoided out of concern about dementia risk.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDementiaFemaleHumansInappropriate PrescribingMaleProspective StudiesProton Pump InhibitorsRisk FactorsWashingtonProton Pump InhibitorsagedAlzheimer diseasecohort studydementiapharmacoepidemiologyproton pump inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID29134629
PMCPMC5809315
OpenAlexW2770930749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.