Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29134571›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2018

Optimizing Residents' Performance of Lumbar Puncture: An RCT Comparing the Effect of Preparatory Interventions on Performance and Self-Confidence.

Mikael Johannes Vuokko Henriksen, Troels Wienecke, Helle Thagesen, Rikke Borre Vita Jacobsen, Yousif Subhi, Ryan Brydges, Charlotte Ringsted, Lars Konge

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. State-of-the-art of lumbar puncture and its place in the journey of patients with Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Mikael Johannes Vuokko HenriksenCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen, The Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark. mikael.johannes.vuokko.henriksen@regionh.dk.
Troels WieneckeFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Helle ThagesenDepartment of Neurology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Rikke Borre Vita JacobsenFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Yousif SubhiFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ryan BrydgesThe Wilson Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Charlotte RingstedCentre for Health Science Education, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lars KongeCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen, The Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark.
Zealand University Hospital · DKCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation · DKAarhus University · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLumbar puncture is often associated with uncertainty and limited experience on the part of residents; therefore, preparatory interventions can be essential. There is growing interest in the potential benefit of videos over written text. However, little attention has been given to whether the design of the videos impacts on subsequent performance.

objectiveTo investigate the effect of different preparatory interventions on learner performance and self-confidence regarding lumbar puncture (LP).

designRandomized controlled trial in which participants were randomly assigned to one of three interventions as preparation for performing lumbar puncture: 1) goal- and learner-centered video (GLV) presenting procedure-specific process goals and learner-centered information; 2) traditional video (TV) providing expert-driven content, but no process goals; and 3) written text (WT) with illustrations. PARTICIPANTS AND MAIN MEASURES: Participants were PGY-1 doctors without LP experience. After the preparatory intervention, participants performed an LP in a simulated setting with a standardized patient and an assistant. Two content experts, blinded to participant group allocation, assessed video recordings of the performance using the Lumbar Puncture Assessment Tool (LumPAT) and an overall global rating. Participants rated their self-confidence immediately prior to performing the procedure. The primary outcome was the difference in LumPAT scores among groups. KEY

resultsA total of 110 PGY-1 doctors were included. Results demonstrated significant differences in LumPAT mean scores among the three groups: GLV, 42.8; TV, 40.6; WT, 38.1 (p = 0.01). The global rating scores were highest in the GLV group (p = 0.026). Self-confidence scores differed significantly among the three groups (p = 0.003), with the TV group scoring the highest. There were no significant correlations between self-confidence scores and performance scores in any of the groups.

conclusionA video designed with procedure-specific process goals and learner-centered information resulted in better subsequent LP performance than a traditionally designed video or written text. Participants' self-confidence was not predictive of their actual performance.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyAdultClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansMaleSpinal PunctureVideo Recordingmedical educationmedical education–clinical skills trainingmedical education–instructional design

Identifiers

PMID29134571
PMCPMC5789103
OpenAlexW2768560117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.