ArticleClinical rheumatology2018
Artery compliance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a case-control study.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-modal transcriptomics: integrating machine learning and convolutional neural networks to identify immune biomarkers in atherosclerosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Atherosclerosis is one of the most common complications of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objective of this study is to evaluate differences in large artery compliance (C1) and small artery compliance (C2) between RA and controls and evaluating factors associated with reduced compliance in the RA population. The profiling of large and small arterial compliance was analyzed in 185 RA patients and 88 healthy controls using Cardiovascular Profiling Instrument. The correlations of arterial compliance and the relevant clinical data were determined in these subjects. Then correlation analysis and regression analysis were performed to find whether rheumatoid arthritis patients have more risk factors than healthy controls in artery compliance and to explore the possible element involved in RA patients including traditional cardiovascular risk factors, RA disease-related factors, and the therapy. Compared with healthy controls, levels of C1 and C2 were significantly decreased in RA patients. Having adjusted the traditional risk factors associated with atherosclerosis, C1 and C2 decline was still a significant indicator in RA patients [odds ratio = 7.411(95%CI 3.275, 16.771) and 10.184(95%CI 4.546, 22.817)]. Using multi-factor regression analysis to adjust traditional risk factors for arterial compliance, we found that the levels of ESR was correlated with the abnormal large artery compliance [odds ratio = 1.021(95%CI 1.007, 1.035)]. The HAQ values and the current usage of leflunomide were correlated with the abnormal small artery compliance in RA patients [odds ratio = 1.161(95%CI 1.046, 1.289) and 6.170(95%CI 1.510, 25.215)]. The values of C1 and C2 are indicators of artery compliance in RA patients. ESR, HAQ values, and the usage of leflunomide might be possible risk factors of artery compliance. The evaluation of artery compliance could be an easy and reliable test that could help us to screen and predict cardiovascular disorders in RA patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.