Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29134443›Full record

ReviewJournal of plant research2018

Circadian clock during plant development.

Keisuke Inoue, Takashi Araki, Motomu Endo

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of plant research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  18. Comparative Transcriptomics of Multi-Stress Responses inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Keisuke InoueGraduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8502, Japan.
Takashi ArakiGraduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8502, Japan.
Motomu EndoGraduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8502, Japan. moendo@lif.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Kyoto University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 16H01240Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 17K19392Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 25113005Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology 888067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants have endogenous biological clocks that allow organisms to anticipate and prepare for daily and seasonal environmental changes and increase their fitness in changing environments. The circadian clock in plants, as in animals and insects, mainly consists of multiple interlocking transcriptional/translational feedback loops. The circadian clock can be entrained by environmental cues such as light, temperature and nutrient status to synchronize internal biological rhythms with surrounding environments. Output pathways link the circadian oscillator to various physiological, developmental, and reproductive processes for adjusting the timing of these biological processes to an appropriate time of day or a suitable season. Recent genomic studies have demonstrated that polymorphism in circadian clock genes may contribute to local adaptations over a wide range of latitudes in many plant species. In the present review, we summarize the circadian regulation of biological processes throughout the life cycle of plants, and describe the contribution of the circadian clock to local adaptation.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalCircadian ClocksPlant DevelopmentCircadian clockDevelopmentLocal adaptationOutput

Identifiers

PMID29134443
PMCPMC5897470
OpenAlexW2769185005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.