Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29134437›Full record

ArticleEcoHealth2018

A Qualitative Stakeholder Analysis of Avian Influenza Policy in Bangladesh.

Kaushik Chattopadhyay, Guillaume Fournié, Md Abul Kalam, Paritosh K Biswas, Ahasanul Hoque, Nitish C Debnath, Mahmudur Rahman, Dirk U Pfeiffer, David Harper, David L Heymann

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EcoHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Kaushik ChattopadhyayDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. kaushik.chattopadhyay@nottingham.ac.uk.
Guillaume FourniéDepartment of Production and Population Health, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK.
Md Abul KalamUSAID's Preparedness and Response Project, Development Alternative Incorporated, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Paritosh K BiswasChittagong Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Ahasanul HoqueChittagong Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Nitish C DebnathFood and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mahmudur RahmanInstitute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Dirk U PfeifferDepartment of Production and Population Health, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, UK.
David HarperCentre on Global Health Security, Chatham House, London, UK.
David L HeymannCentre on Global Health Security, Chatham House, London, UK.
Chatham House · GBChattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University · BDRoyal Veterinary College · GBInstitute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research · BDUniversity of Development Alternative · BDUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L018993/1Medical Research CouncilZoonoses and Emerging Livestock Systems (ZELS) BB/L018993/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Avian influenza is a major animal and public health concern in Bangladesh. A decade after development and implementation of the first national avian influenza and human pandemic influenza preparedness and response plan in Bangladesh, a two-stage qualitative stakeholder analysis was performed in relation to the policy development process and the actual policy. This study specifically aimed to identify the future policy options to prevent and control avian influenza and other poultry-related zoonotic diseases in Bangladesh. It was recommended that the policy should be based on the One Health concept, be evidence-based, sustainable, reviewed and updated as necessary. The future policy environment that is suitable for developing and implementing these policies should take into account the following points: the need to formally engage multiple sectors, the need for clear and acceptable leadership, roles and responsibilities and the need for a common pool of resources and provision for transferring resources. Most of these recommendations are directed towards the Government of Bangladesh. However, other sectors, including research and poultry production stakeholders, also have a major role to play to inform policy making and actively participate in the multi-sectoral approach.

Indexed as

Policy MakingAnimalsBangladeshBirdsCultural CharacteristicsGuidelines as TopicInfluenza in BirdsInterviews as TopicPoultry ProductsSocioeconomic Factorsavian influenzaBangladeshOne Healthpolicypoultry-related zoonosesstakeholder analysis

Identifiers

PMID29134437
PMCPMC6003964
OpenAlexW2770578191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.