ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2017
Imaging of Cardiovascular Disease in Pregnancy and the Peripartum Period.
Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Peripartum Cardiomyopathy: Risks Diagnosis and Management.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Review
- Acute Coronary Syndrome in Pregnancy and the Post-Partum Period.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Review
- Vaginal delivery in a patient with severe aortic stenosis under epidural analgesia, a case report.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2020Article
- Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty for Aortic Stenosis.Journal of interventional cardiology · 2020Article
- The Role of Multimodality Cardiovascular Imaging in Peripartum Cardiomyopathy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020Review
- Successful totally transthoracic echocardiography guided transcatheter device closure of atrial septal defect in pregnant women.World journal of clinical cases · 2019Article
- Early-onset peri-partum cardiomyopathy in a twin gestation: A rare presentation.Medical journal, Armed Forces IndiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementCardiovascular disease is an important cause of morbidity and mortality during pregnancy and the postpartum period. During pregnancy, the cardiovascular system undergoes extensive hemodynamic, hormonal, and microstructural changes which may exacerbate a preexisting underlying cardiovascular condition or predispose to cardiovascular complications not typically seen in young healthy women. Such conditions include spontaneous coronary artery dissection, atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, and peripartum cardiomyopathy. When evaluating this patient population, the diagnostic strategy should be tailored to specifically assess this distinct disease spectrum. The choice of imaging techniques must also consider potential risks to both the mother and child; a unique challenge of diagnostic imaging during pregnancy. The risk of radiation from radiography, computed tomography, and nuclear medicine imaging; iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast media for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging respectively; and heat deposition from sonography are of special importance during pregnancy. A thorough understanding of pregnancy-specific cardiovascular complications and the capabilities and risks of available diagnostic imaging modalities is crucial to appropriately manage the pregnant patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.