Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29134357›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2018

Apparent diffusion coefficient of vertebral haemangiomas allows differentiation from malignant focal deposits in whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI.

Jessica M Winfield, Gabriele Poillucci, Matthew D Blackledge, David J Collins, Vallari Shah, Nina Tunariu, Martin F Kaiser, Christina Messiou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Vertebral hemangiomas: a review on diagnosis and management.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Differentiating atypical hemangiomas and vertebral metastases: a field-of-view (FOV) and FOCUS intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. MRI versusEuropean radiology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jessica M WinfieldCancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK. jessica.winfield@icr.ac.uk.
Gabriele PoillucciDepartment of Radiology, MRI Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK.
Matthew D BlackledgeCancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK.
David J CollinsCancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK.
Vallari ShahHaemato-Oncology Research Unit, Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Nina TunariuCancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK.
Martin F KaiserHaemato-Oncology Research Unit, Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Christina MessiouCancer Research UK Cancer Imaging Centre, Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London, SW7 3RP, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16464Cancer Research UK C1060/A10334Cancer Research UK C1060/A16464Medical Research Council G0701533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to identify apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for typical haemangiomas in the spine and to compare them with active malignant focal deposits.

methodsThis was a retrospective single-institution study. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of 106 successive patients with active multiple myeloma, metastatic prostate or breast cancer were analysed. ADC values of typical vertebral haemangiomas and malignant focal deposits were recorded.

resultsThe ADC of haemangiomas (72 ROIs, median ADC 1,085×10

conclusionsADC values of classical vertebral haemangiomas are significantly higher than malignant focal deposits. The high ADC of vertebral haemangiomas allows them to be distinguished visually and quantitatively from active sites of disease, which show restricted diffusion. KEY POINTS: • Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI is becoming widely used in myeloma and bone metastases. • ADC values of vertebral haemangiomas are significantly higher than malignant focal deposits. • High ADCs of haemangiomas allows them to be distinguished from active disease.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHemangiomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificitySpinal NeoplasmsBone neoplasmsDiffusion magnetic resonance imagingHaemangiomaMultiple myelomaWhole body imaging

Identifiers

PMID29134357
PMCPMC5834553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.