Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29134139›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2017

Male sex pheromone components in

Kathy Darragh, Sohini Vanjari, Florian Mann, Maria F Gonzalez-Rojas, Colin R Morrison, Camilo Salazar, Carolina Pardo-Diaz, Richard M Merrill, W Owen McMillan, Stefan Schulz and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Kathy Darragh *Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.
Sohini Vanjari *Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.
Florian Mann *Institute of Organic Chemistry, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Maria F Gonzalez-Rojas *Biology Program, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Universidad del Rosario, Bogota, Colombia.
Colin R MorrisonSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama.
Camilo SalazarBiology Program, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Universidad del Rosario, Bogota, Colombia.
Carolina Pardo-DiazBiology Program, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Universidad del Rosario, Bogota, Colombia.
Richard M MerrillDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.
W Owen McMillanSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama.
Stefan SchulzInstitute of Organic Chemistry, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Chris D JigginsDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom.
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute · PAUniversidad del Rosario · COTechnische Universität Braunschweig · DEThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

European Research Council 339873
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex-specific pheromones are known to play an important role in butterfly courtship, and may influence both individual reproductive success and reproductive isolation between species. Extensive ecological, behavioural and genetic studies of

Indexed as

AndroconiaHeliconiusLepidopteraMate choicePheromoneReproductive isolationSexual selection

Identifiers

PMID29134139
PMCPMC5680698
OpenAlexW2767319049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.