Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29134115›Full record

ReviewFuture science OA2017

Plant stem cells in cosmetics: current trends and future directions.

Sonia Trehan, Bozena Michniak-Kohn, Kavita Beri

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future science OA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Inhibition of melanogenesis byInternational journal of medical sciences · 2021
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Plant Stem Cells in Cosmetic Industry.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Rice (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Raspberry Ketone Accumulation inJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Establishment of Stem Cell-like Cells ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. PlantsFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
  14. The Metabolite Profile in Culture Supernatant ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sonia TrehanCenter for Dermal Research, Center for Biomaterials, Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Bozena Michniak-KohnCenter for Dermal Research, Center for Biomaterials, Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Kavita BeriCenter for Dermal Research, Center for Biomaterials, Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant regeneration at the cellular and tissue level is a unique process. Similar to animals, the stem cells in plants have properties that help stimulate and regenerate plants after injury. The unique properties of plant stem cells have been a recent area of interest and focus both in developing new cosmetics and studying how these extracts/phytohormones will influence animal skin. This special report focuses on the current evidence-based trends in plant stem cell-based cosmetics and sheds light on the challenges that we need to overcome in order to see meaningful changes in human skin using topical cosmetics derived from plant stem cells.

Indexed as

aging skinantiagingAyurvedacosmeticsepidermal stem cellsherbsplant stem cellsregeneration

Identifiers

PMID29134115
PMCPMC5674215
OpenAlexW2735650008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.