Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29133907›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

A primacy code for odor identity.

Christopher D Wilson, Gabriela O Serrano, Alexei A Koulakov, Dmitry Rinberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Convergent motifs of early olfactory processing are recapitulated by layer-wise efficient coding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Temporal sequence geometry enables odor recognition and generalization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Order code in the olfactory system.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. When noncanonical olfaction is optimal.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher D WilsonNYU Neuroscience Institute, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Gabriela O SerranoNYU Neuroscience Institute, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Alexei A KoulakovCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, NY, 11724, USA.
Dmitry RinbergNYU Neuroscience Institute, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, 10016, USA. rinberg@nyu.edu.

Funding

CRCNS: Sparse odor coding in the olfactory bulbR01DC014366 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI KOULAKOV, ALEXEI, RINBERG, DMITRY · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
Coding primitives in early olfactory processing - Resubmission - 1R01DC013797 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI RINBERG, DMITRY · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013797NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans can identify visual objects independently of view angle and lighting, words independently of volume and pitch, and smells independently of concentration. The computational principles underlying invariant object recognition remain mostly unknown. Here we propose that, in olfaction, a small and relatively stable set comprised of the earliest activated receptors forms a code for concentration-invariant odor identity. One prediction of this "primacy coding" scheme is that decisions based on odor identity can be made solely using early odor-evoked neural activity. Using an optogenetic masking paradigm, we define the sensory integration time necessary for odor identification and demonstrate that animals can use information occurring <100 ms after inhalation onset to identify odors. Using multi-electrode array recordings of odor responses in the olfactory bulb, we find that concentration-invariant units respond earliest and at latencies that are within this behaviorally-defined time window. We propose a computational model demonstrating how such a code can be read by neural circuits of the olfactory system.

Indexed as

AnimalsComputer SimulationElectrophysiological PhenomenaFemaleMaleMiceModels, AnimalNeuronsOdorantsOlfactory BulbOlfactory PathwaysOlfactory PerceptionOptogeneticsPerceptual MaskingSmellTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID29133907
PMCPMC5684307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.