Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29133890›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2017

Longrange PCR-based next-generation sequencing in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics study of propofol among patients under general anaesthesia.

Oliwia Zakerska-Banaszak, Marzena Skrzypczak-Zielinska, Barbara Tamowicz, Adam Mikstacki, Michal Walczak, Michal Prendecki, Jolanta Dorszewska, Agnieszka Pollak, Urszula Lechowicz, Monika Oldak and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Oliwia Zakerska-BanaszakInstitute of Human Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszynska 32, 60-479, Poznan, Poland.
Marzena Skrzypczak-ZielinskaInstitute of Human Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszynska 32, 60-479, Poznan, Poland. mskrzypczakzielinska@gmail.com.
Barbara TamowiczFaculty of Health Sciences, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Smoluchowskiego 11, 60-179, Poznan, Poland.
Adam MikstackiFaculty of Health Sciences, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Smoluchowskiego 11, 60-179, Poznan, Poland.
Michal WalczakInstitute of Human Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszynska 32, 60-479, Poznan, Poland.
Michal PrendeckiLaboratory of Neurobiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Przybyszewskiego 49, 60-355, Poznan, Poland.
Jolanta DorszewskaLaboratory of Neurobiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Przybyszewskiego 49, 60-355, Poznan, Poland.
Agnieszka PollakDepartment of Genetics, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mokra 17, Warsaw/Kajetany, 05-830, Nadarzyn, Poland.
Urszula LechowiczDepartment of Genetics, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mokra 17, Warsaw/Kajetany, 05-830, Nadarzyn, Poland.
Monika OldakDepartment of Genetics, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mokra 17, Warsaw/Kajetany, 05-830, Nadarzyn, Poland.
Kinga Huminska-LisowskaFaculty of Physical Education, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Kazimierza Gorskiego 1, 80-336, Gdansk, Poland.
Marta Molinska-GluraDepartment of Computer Science and Statistics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Dabrowskiego 79, 60-529, Poznan, Poland.
Marlena SzalataDepartment of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Life Sciences, Dojazd 11, 60-637, Poznan, Poland.
Ryszard SlomskiInstitute of Human Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszynska 32, 60-479, Poznan, Poland.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PLInstitute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing · PLInstitute of Human Genetics · PLPolish Academy of Sciences · PLGdansk University of Physical Education and Sport · PLUniversity of Life Sciences in Poznań · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The individual response of patients to propofol results from the influence of genetic factors. However, the state of knowledge in this matter still remains insufficient. The aim of our study was to determine genetic predictors of variable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol within selected 9 genes coding for propofol biotransformation enzymes, receptors and transporters. Our studies are the first extensive pharmaocgenetics research of propofol using high throughput sequencing technology. After the design and optimization of long range PCR-based next-generation sequencing experiment, we screened promoter and coding sequences of all genes analyzed among 87 Polish patients undergoing general anaesthesia with propofol. Initially we found that two variants, c.516 G > T in the CYP2B6 gene and c.2677 T > G in the ABCB1 gene, significantly correlate with propofol's metabolic profile, however after Bonferroni correction the P-values were not statistically significant. Our results suggest, that variants within the CYP2B6 and ABCB1 genes correlate stronger with propofol's metabolic profile compared to other 7 genes. CYP2B6 and ABCB1 variants can play a potentially important role in response to this anaesthetic and they are promising object for further studies.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, GeneticPropofolAdultATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily BCytochrome P-450 CYP2B6FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedABCB1 protein, humanATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily BCYP2B6 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP2B6Propofol

Identifiers

PMID29133890
PMCPMC5684313
OpenAlexW2767699450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.