Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29133620›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer therapeutics2018

Evaluation of CDK12 Protein Expression as a Potential Novel Biomarker for DNA Damage Response-Targeted Therapies in Breast Cancer.

Kalnisha Naidoo, Patty T Wai, Sarah L Maguire, Frances Daley, Syed Haider, Divya Kriplani, James Campbell, Hasan Mirza, Anita Grigoriadis, Andrew Tutt and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer therapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. StableFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Kalnisha NaidooThe Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Patty T WaiThe Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Sarah L MaguireThe Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Frances DaleyThe Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Syed HaiderThe Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Divya KriplaniThe Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
James CampbellThe Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Hasan MirzaCancer Bioinformatics, Cancer Division, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Anita GrigoriadisCancer Bioinformatics, Cancer Division, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew TuttThe Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Paul M MoseleyClinical Oncology, The University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Tarek M A Abdel-FatahClinical Oncology, The University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Stephen Y T ChanClinical Oncology, The University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Srinivasan MadhusudanDepartment of Histopathology and Division of Cancer & Stem Cells, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Emad A RhakaDepartment of Histopathology and Division of Cancer & Stem Cells, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Ian O EllisDepartment of Histopathology and Division of Cancer & Stem Cells, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Christopher J LordThe Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Yinyin YuanDivision of Molecular Pathology, Centre for Evolution and Cancer and Centre for Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew R GreenDepartment of Histopathology and Division of Cancer & Stem Cells, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Rachael NatrajanThe Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom. rachael.natrajan@icr.ac.uk.

Funding

Breast Cancer Now 2011MAYSF01Cancer Research UK 14276Cancer Research UK 24439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disruption of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 12 (

Indexed as

DNA DamageBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCyclin-Dependent KinasesFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorCDK12 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinases

Identifiers

PMID29133620
PMCPMC6284786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.