ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2017
Protoenzymes: the case of hyperbranched polyesters.
Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent progress in primitive polyester synthesis and membraneless microdroplet assembly.Biophysics and physicobiology · 2023Article
- Introduction-First Billion Years: Habitability.Astrobiology · 2021Review
- Prebiotic oligomerization and self-assembly of structurally diverse xenobiological monomers.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Protoenzymes: The Case of Hyperbranched Polymer-Scaffolded ZnS Nanocrystals.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Polyesters as a Model System for Building Primitive Biologies from Non-Biological Prebiotic Chemistry.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Wet-Dry Cycling Delays the Gelation of Hyperbranched Polyesters: Implications to the Origin of Life.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Toward Experimental Evolution with Giant Vesicles.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Re-conceptualizing the origins of life.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enzymes are biopolymeric complexes that catalyse biochemical reactions and shape metabolic pathways. Enzymes usually work with small molecule cofactors that actively participate in reaction mechanisms and complex, usually globular, polymeric structures capable of specific substrate binding, encapsulation and orientation. Moreover, the globular structures of enzymes possess cavities with modulated microenvironments, facilitating the progression of reaction(s). The globular structure is ensured by long folded protein or RNA strands. Synthesis of such elaborate complexes has proven difficult under prebiotically plausible conditions. We explore here that catalysis may have been performed by alternative polymeric structures, namely hyperbranched polymers. Hyperbranched polymers are relatively complex structures that can be synthesized under prebiotically plausible conditions; their globular structure is ensured by virtue of their architecture rather than folding. In this study, we probe the ability of tertiary amine-bearing hyperbranched polyesters to form hydrophobic pockets as a reaction-promoting medium for the Kemp elimination reaction. Our results show that polyesters formed upon reaction between glycerol, triethanolamine and organic acid containing hydrophobic groups, i.e. adipic and methylsuccinic acid, are capable of increasing the rate of Kemp elimination by a factor of up to 3 over monomeric triethanolamine.This article is part of the themed issue 'Reconceptualizing the origins of life'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.