Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29133444›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2017

Exploring astrobiology using

Markus Meringer, H James Cleaves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Open questions in understanding life's origins.Communications chemistry · 2021
    Article
  8. Prebiotic Reaction Networks in Water.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. A continuous reaction network that produces RNA precursors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Systems protobiology: origin of life in lipid catalytic networks.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2018
    Review
  14. Re-conceptualizing the origins of life.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Markus MeringerEarth Observation Center (EOC), German Aerospace Center (DLR), Münchner Straße 20, 82234 Oberpfaffenhofen-Wessling, Germany.
H James CleavesEarth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-IE-1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan henderson.cleaves@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4101-0654

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The origin of life is typically understood as a transition from inanimate or disorganized matter to self-organized, 'animate' matter. This transition probably took place largely in the context of organic compounds, and most approaches, to date, have focused on using the organic chemical composition of modern organisms as the main guide for understanding this process. However, it has gradually come to be appreciated that biochemistry, as we know it, occupies a minute volume of the possible organic 'chemical space'. As the majority of abiotic syntheses appear to make a large set of compounds not found in biochemistry, as well as an incomplete subset of those that are, it is possible that life began with a significantly different set of components. Chemical graph-based structure generation methods allow for exhaustive

Indexed as

Computer SimulationExobiologyLifeAmino AcidsOrigin of LifeAmino Acidsbiochemical evolutionchemical spacechemoinformaticsmolecular graphorigin of lifeprebiotic chemistry

Identifiers

PMID29133444
PMCPMC5686402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.