Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29133443›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2017

The thermodynamic efficiency of computations made in cells across the range of life.

Christopher P Kempes, David Wolpert, Zachary Cohen, Juan Pérez-Mercader

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Energy constraint on human health.Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Why cellular computations challenge our design principles.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Is stochastic thermodynamics the key to understanding the energy costs of computation?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Diversity and metabolic energy in bacteria.FEMS microbiology letters · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Fate of Duplicated Neural Structures.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher P KempesThe Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA ckempes@santafe.edu.
David WolpertThe Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA.
Zachary CohenDepartment of Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana Champagne, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Juan Pérez-MercaderDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Arizona State University · USHarvard University · USSanta Fe Institute · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological organisms must perform computation as they grow, reproduce and evolve. Moreover, ever since Landauer's bound was proposed, it has been known that all computation has some thermodynamic cost-and that the same computation can be achieved with greater or smaller thermodynamic cost depending on how it is implemented. Accordingly an important issue concerning the evolution of life is assessing the thermodynamic efficiency of the computations performed by organisms. This issue is interesting both from the perspective of how close life has come to maximally efficient computation (presumably under the pressure of natural selection), and from the practical perspective of what efficiencies we might hope that engineered biological computers might achieve, especially in comparison with current computational systems. Here we show that the computational efficiency of translation, defined as free energy expended per amino acid operation, outperforms the best supercomputers by several orders of magnitude, and is only about an order of magnitude worse than the Landauer bound. However, this efficiency depends strongly on the size and architecture of the cell in question. In particular, we show that the

Indexed as

LifeBiological EvolutionCellsProtein BiosynthesisThermodynamicsbiological computationevolutionary transitionsmetabolic scalingthermodynamics of computation

Identifiers

PMID29133443
PMCPMC5686401
OpenAlexW2626835270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.