Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29133398›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Analysis of high-resolution 3D intrachromosomal interactions aided by Bayesian network modeling.

Xizhe Zhang, Sergio Branciamore, Grigoriy Gogoshin, Andrei S Rodin, Arthur D Riggs

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Synthetic data generation with probabilistic Bayesian Networks.Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xizhe ZhangDepartment of Diabetes Complications and Metabolism, Diabetes and Metabolism Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA.
Sergio BranciamoreDepartment of Diabetes Complications and Metabolism, Diabetes and Metabolism Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA.
Grigoriy GogoshinDepartment of Diabetes Complications and Metabolism, Diabetes and Metabolism Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA.
Andrei S RodinDepartment of Diabetes Complications and Metabolism, Diabetes and Metabolism Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA.
Arthur D RiggsDepartment of Diabetes Complications and Metabolism, Diabetes and Metabolism Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA ariggs@coh.org.
City of Hope · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-range intrachromosomal interactions play an important role in 3D chromosome structure and function, but our understanding of how various factors contribute to the strength of these interactions remains poor. In this study we used a recently developed analysis framework for Bayesian network (BN) modeling to analyze publicly available datasets for intrachromosomal interactions. We investigated how 106 variables affect the pairwise interactions of over 10 million 5-kb DNA segments in the B-lymphocyte cell line GB12878. Strictly data-driven BN modeling indicates that the strength of intrachromosomal interactions (hic_strength) is directly influenced by only four types of factors: distance between segments, Rad21 or SMC3 (cohesin components),transcription at transcription start sites (TSS), and the number of CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF)-cohesin complexes between the interacting DNA segments. Subsequent studies confirmed that most high-intensity interactions have a CTCF-cohesin complex in at least one of the interacting segments. However, 46% have CTCF on only one side, and 32% are without CTCF. As expected, high-intensity interactions are strongly dependent on the orientation of the ctcf motif, and, moreover, we find that the interaction between enhancers and promoters is similarly dependent on ctcf motif orientation. Dependency relationships between transcription factors were also revealed, including known lineage-determining B-cell transcription factors (e.g., Ebf1) as well as potential novel relationships. Thus, BN analysis of large intrachromosomal interaction datasets is a useful tool for gaining insight into DNA-DNA, protein-DNA, and protein-protein interactions.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremModels, MolecularBinding SitesB-LymphocytesCell Cycle ProteinsCell LineChondroitin Sulfate ProteoglycansChromatinChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneComputational BiologyDatasets as TopicDNADNA-Binding ProteinsHumansMolecular ConformationNuclear ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsChondroitin Sulfate ProteoglycansChromatinChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCTCFL protein, humanDNADNA-Binding ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPhosphoproteinsRAD21 protein, humanSMC3 protein, humanTranscription FactorschromatinDNA loopingDNA reelingenhancers

Identifiers

PMID29133398
PMCPMC5715735
OpenAlexW2770650282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.