Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29133393›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Sequential induction of Fur-regulated genes in response to iron limitation in

Hualiang Pi, John D Helmann

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Microbial metal physiology: ions to ecosystems.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Akkermansia muciniphila MucNature communications · 2025
    Article
  11. Exploring metalloproteome remodeling in calprotectin-stressedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Linking Virulence and Iron Limitation Response inJournal of proteome research · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. TheJournal of bacteriology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. ThebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hualiang PiDepartment of Microbiology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-8101.
John D HelmannDepartment of Microbiology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-8101 jdh9@cornell.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3832-3249
Cornell University · US

Funding

Bacillus subtilis Stress ResponsesR35GM122461 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI John D Helmann · 2017 to 2026
$7.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial cells modulate transcription in response to changes in iron availability. The ferric uptake regulator (Fur) senses intracellular iron availability and plays a central role in maintaining iron homeostasis in

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialBacillus subtilisBacterial ProteinsBenzamidesCarrier ProteinsFerric CompoundsFlavodoxinHomeostasisIronListeria monocytogenesOligopeptidesOperonRegulonRepressor ProteinsSiderophoresbacillibactinBacterial ProteinsBenzamidesCarrier Proteinsferric citrateFerric Compoundsferric uptake regulating proteins, bacterialFlavodoxinIronOligopeptidesperoxide repressor proteinspetrobactinRepressor ProteinsSiderophoresFur regulongraded responseiron limitationiron-sparing response

Identifiers

PMID29133393
PMCPMC5715773
OpenAlexW2769717562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.