Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29132830›Full record

ArticleUrologic oncology2019

Characterizing recurrent and lethal small renal masses in clear cell renal cell carcinoma using recurrent somatic mutations.

Brandon J Manley, Ed Reznik, Mazyar Ghanaat, Mahyar Kashan, Maria F Becerra, Jozefina Casuscelli, Daniel Tennenbaum, Almedina Redzematovic, Maria I Carlo, Yusuke Sato and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urologic oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. The evolving management of small renal masses.Nature reviews. Urology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Current Management of Small Renal Masses, Including Patient Selection, Renal Tumor Biopsy, Active Surveillance, and Thermal Ablation.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. [Limits of surgery in uro-oncology].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Brandon J ManleyDepartment of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.
Ed ReznikDepartment of Medicine, Molecular Oncology, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Mazyar GhanaatDepartment of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.
Mahyar KashanDepartment of Medicine, Molecular Oncology, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Maria F BecerraDepartment of Medicine, Molecular Oncology, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Jozefina CasuscelliDepartment of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Daniel TennenbaumDepartment of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.
Almedina RedzematovicGenitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Maria I CarloGenitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Yusuke SatoDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Maria ArcilaDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Martin H VossGenitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Darren R FeldmanGenitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Robert J MotzerGenitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Paul RussoDepartment of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.
Jonathan ColemanDepartment of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.
James J HsiehDepartment of Medicine, Molecular Oncology, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Ari A HakimiDepartment of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL. Electronic address: hakimia@mskcc.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USMolecular Oncology (United States) · USLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEThe University of Tokyo · JPWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Disparities in COVID Disease Severity and Outcomes in New York CityUL1TR002384 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI JULIANNE L IMPERATO-MCGINLEY · 2017 to 2026
$86.2M
Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR000457 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI IMPERATO-MCGINLEY, JULIANNE L · 2012 to 2016
$46.0M
UROLOGY ONCOLOGY RESEARCH TRAINING GRANTT32CA082088 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Brett Stewart Carver · 1999 to 2026
$7.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000457NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002384NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS T32 CA082088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSmall renal masses (SRMs) with evidence of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) are understudied. Current algorithms for the management of SRMs include surgical resection, ablation, and active surveillance. We sought to identify genomic biomarkers that could potentially refine the management of ccRCC in SRMs, especially in patients being evaluated for active surveillance.

methodsWe identified patients who had SRMs (4cm or less) at time of surgery, had sequencing performed on their primary tumor and had a diagnosis of ccRCC. Patients were selected from 3 publicly available cohorts, The Cancer Genome Atlas (n = 110), University of Tokyo (n = 37), The International Cancer Genome Consortium (n = 31), and from our own institutional prospective database (n = 25). Among this cohort we analyzed mutations present in at least 5% of tumors, assessing for the enrichment of mutations and progression-free survival using the composite endpoint of recurrence or death of disease. Analysis was adjusted for multiple testing. A Cox regression model was used to assess clinical variables with significant mutations.

resultsIn total, 203 patients were available for analysis. Median follow-up was 43.1 months among survivors. Mutations in VHL, PBRM1, SETD2, BAP1, KDM5C, and MTOR were present in more than 5% of tumors. Twenty-three patients (11.3%) had recurrence or died of their disease. Mutations in KDM5C were associated with inferior survival from either recurrence or death from disease, adjusted P 0.033.

conclusionsWe identified mutations in SRMs in ccRCC that are associated with recurrence and lethality. The strongest association was seen in those with KDM5C mutations. Use of these genomic biomarkers may improve stratification of patients with SRMs and for those who may be appropriate for active surveillance. Prospective evaluation of these markers is needed.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoma, Renal CellFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMutationGenomic biomarkersKDM5CmutationsRisk stratificationSmall renal masses

Identifiers

PMID29132830
PMCPMC5984192
OpenAlexW2767377918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.