ArticleUrologic oncology2019
Characterizing recurrent and lethal small renal masses in clear cell renal cell carcinoma using recurrent somatic mutations.
Article in Urologic oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expression of PBRM1 as a prognostic predictor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor.International journal of clinical oncology · 2020Trial
- Differences in mutations across tumour sizes in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma.BJU international · 2025Article
- The evolving management of small renal masses.Nature reviews. Urology · 2024Review
- Exploring the Characteristics of Circulating Tumor DNA in Pt1a Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Pilot Study.Cancers · 2023Article
- Small Renal Masses: The Evolving Histologic, Imaging, and Genomic Landscapes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Correlating Immune Cell Infiltration Patterns with Recurrent Somatic Mutations in Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.European urology focus · 2022Article
- Review
- Somatic mutations as preoperative predictors of metastases in patients with localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma - An exploratory analysis.Urologic oncology · 2021Article
- Association between visceral adiposity and DDX11 as a predictor of aggressiveness of small clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma: a prospective clinical trial.Cancer & metabolism · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Combining molecular and imaging metrics in cancer: radiogenomics.Insights into imaging · 2020Review
- Are the long-term outcomes of percutaneous ablation for clinical stage T1 renal tumors similar to those of partial nephrectomy?Annals of translational medicine · 2019Article
- Harnessing the Genomic Landscape of the Small Renal Mass to Guide Clinical Management.European urology focus · 2019Review
- Risk Prediction Tool for Aggressive Tumors in Clinical T1 Stage Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Molecular Biomarkers.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2019Article
- Current Management of Small Renal Masses, Including Patient Selection, Renal Tumor Biopsy, Active Surveillance, and Thermal Ablation.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018Review
- Identification of gene expression levels in primary melanoma associated with clinically meaningful characteristics.Melanoma research · 2018Article
- [Limits of surgery in uro-oncology].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2018Review
- [Watchful waiting and active surveillance of small renal masses].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSmall renal masses (SRMs) with evidence of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) are understudied. Current algorithms for the management of SRMs include surgical resection, ablation, and active surveillance. We sought to identify genomic biomarkers that could potentially refine the management of ccRCC in SRMs, especially in patients being evaluated for active surveillance.
methodsWe identified patients who had SRMs (4cm or less) at time of surgery, had sequencing performed on their primary tumor and had a diagnosis of ccRCC. Patients were selected from 3 publicly available cohorts, The Cancer Genome Atlas (n = 110), University of Tokyo (n = 37), The International Cancer Genome Consortium (n = 31), and from our own institutional prospective database (n = 25). Among this cohort we analyzed mutations present in at least 5% of tumors, assessing for the enrichment of mutations and progression-free survival using the composite endpoint of recurrence or death of disease. Analysis was adjusted for multiple testing. A Cox regression model was used to assess clinical variables with significant mutations.
resultsIn total, 203 patients were available for analysis. Median follow-up was 43.1 months among survivors. Mutations in VHL, PBRM1, SETD2, BAP1, KDM5C, and MTOR were present in more than 5% of tumors. Twenty-three patients (11.3%) had recurrence or died of their disease. Mutations in KDM5C were associated with inferior survival from either recurrence or death from disease, adjusted P 0.033.
conclusionsWe identified mutations in SRMs in ccRCC that are associated with recurrence and lethality. The strongest association was seen in those with KDM5C mutations. Use of these genomic biomarkers may improve stratification of patients with SRMs and for those who may be appropriate for active surveillance. Prospective evaluation of these markers is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.