Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29132436›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2017

Towards fair and effective North-South collaboration: realising a programme for demand-driven and locally led research.

Maarten Olivier Kok, John Owusu Gyapong, Ivan Wolffers, David Ofori-Adjei, Elis Joost Ruitenberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Maarten Olivier KokInstitute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.o.kok@vu.nl.
John Owusu GyapongInstitute of Health Research, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
Ivan WolffersDepartment of Health Care and Culture, VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
David Ofori-AdjeiNoguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Elis Joost RuitenbergAmsterdam Public Health, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLUniversity of Ghana · GHUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences · GH

Funding

Medical Research Council G1001337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt the turn of the 90s, studies showed that health research contributed little to health and development in low- and middle-income countries because it was oriented towards international priorities and dominated by researchers from the North. A new approach to North-South collaboration was required that would support demand-driven and locally led research in the South. The aim of this study was to analyse the development and functioning of a programme for demand-driven and locally led research in Ghana that was supported by a North-South collaboration.

methodsFor this mixed-method case study, we combined document analysis, key informant interviews and observation of programme events.

resultsThe development of the research programme started with constructing a sponsorship constellation in the Netherlands. After highlighting the problems with traditional research collaboration, an advisory council formulated a vision for a more equal and effective approach to North-South collaboration. Together with Ghanaian partners, this vision was turned into a proposal for a Ghanaian-led programme for demand-driven and locally led research, which was funded by the Netherlands government. Research priority setting showed that the Ghanaian research needs were very different from the priorities of foreign funders and researchers. After a slow start, the number of locally submitted proposals increased from 13 in 2001 to 94 in 2005, revealing the existence of a substantial, but partly latent reservoir of research capacity. In total, 79 studies were funded. An impact evaluation showed that the results of the majority of the studies were used to contribute to action. Despite its success, the research programme came to an end in 2008 after the sponsorship constellation in the Netherlands fell apart.

conclusionOur study shows that realising a programme for demand-driven and locally led research in the South provides an effective approach to North-South collaboration in which results are used and local capacities and institutions are strengthened.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesInternational CooperationCapacity BuildingCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCooperative BehaviorGhanaHumansNetherlandsOrganizational Case StudiesProgram EvaluationResearchCapacity strengtheningContribution mappingHealth research systemMultilevelNorth–South collaboration

Identifiers

PMID29132436
PMCPMC5683379
OpenAlexW2769890275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.