ArticleBMC medical education2017
Application of latent class analysis in assessing the competency of physicians in China.
Article in BMC medical education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a tool to assess core competencies of public health professionals in low-income settings: findings from Uttar Pradesh, India.Human resources for health · 2025Article
- Association Between Clinical Competencies and Mental Health Symptoms Among Frontline Medical Staff During the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Cross-Sectional Study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Latent class analysis of depression and anxiety among medical students during COVID-19 epidemic.BMC psychiatry · 2021Article
- Mental workload of frontline nurses aiding in the COVID-19 pandemic: A latent profile analysis.Journal of advanced nursing · 2021Article
- Analysis of factors and corresponding interactions influencing clinical management assistant ability using competency model in China.Medicine · 2020Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe physicians' competency is an important public health issue around the world. Several international organizations have taken the lead in examining the competencies required to be a physician. The purpose of this study is to identify subgroups of physicians' competency based upon the importance results of competency evaluation and provide a scientific basis for the qualitative research of the competency of physicians.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on a large population-based sample in 31 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the central government in China. The latent class analysis was performed to identify patterns of physicians' competency using M-plus software.
resultsIn this study, the latent class analysis was adopted to identify the appropriate number of distinct latent classes of physicians' competency based on eight competency dimensions, and a four-class model best fit the data, which are excellent competency group, lack of professionalism competency group, individual competency driven group, and lack of competency cognitive group. Therefore, 6247 physicians can be divided into four latent classes based on the importance results of competency evaluation, and the number of each class is 5684, 284, 215 and 64, respectively.
conclusionThese findings suggested that latent class analysis can be used to study the competency of physicians, and four distinct subgroups were identified. Therefore, we can effectively understand the patterns of physicians' competency, and the health administrative departments could utilize more specific measures according to their different competency subgroups, and providing individualized training schemes in the future training and management of physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.