Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29132402›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2017

Efficient high-throughput molecular method to detect Ehrlichia ruminantium in ticks.

Nídia Cangi, Valérie Pinarello, Laure Bournez, Thierry Lefrançois, Emmanuel Albina, Luís Neves, Nathalie Vachiéry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nídia CangiCIRAD, UMR ASTRE, F-97170, Petit-Bourg, Guadeloupe, France.
Valérie PinarelloCIRAD, UMR ASTRE, F-97170, Petit-Bourg, Guadeloupe, France.
Laure BournezCIRAD, UMR ASTRE, F-97170, Petit-Bourg, Guadeloupe, France.
Thierry LefrançoisCIRAD, UMR ASTRE, F-97170, Petit-Bourg, Guadeloupe, France.
Emmanuel AlbinaCIRAD, UMR ASTRE, F-97170, Petit-Bourg, Guadeloupe, France.
Luís NevesCentro de Biotecnologia-UEM, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique.
Nathalie VachiéryCIRAD, UMR ASTRE, F-97170, Petit-Bourg, Guadeloupe, France. nathalie.vachiery@cirad.fr.

Funding

European Regional Development Fund 2015-FED-186FUNDO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGAÇÃO 133-Inv/FNI/ 2012-2013Seventh Framework Programme 31598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEhrlichia ruminantium is the causal agent of heartwater, a fatal tropical disease affecting ruminants with important economic impacts. This bacterium is transmitted by Amblyomma ticks and is present in sub-Saharan Africa, islands in the Indian Ocean and the Caribbean, where it represents a threat to the American mainland.

methodsAn automated DNA extraction method was adapted for Amblyomma ticks and a new qPCR targeting the pCS20 region was developed to improve E. ruminantium screening capacity and diagnosis. The first step in the preparation of tick samples, before extraction, was not automated but was considerably improved by using a Tissue Lyser. The new pCS20 Sol1 qPCR and a previously published pCS20 Cow qPCR were evaluated with the OIE standard pCS20 nested PCR.

resultspCS20 Sol1 qPCR was found to be more specific than the nested PCR, with a 5-fold increase in sensitivity (3 copies/reaction vs 15 copies/reaction), was less prone to contamination and less time-consuming. As pCS20 Sol1 qPCR did not detect Rickettsia, Anasplasma and Babesia species or closely related species such as Panola Mountain Ehrlichia, E. chaffeensis and E. canis, its specificity was also better than Cow qPCR. In parallel, a tick 16S qPCR was developed for the quality control of DNA extraction that confirmed the good reproducibility of the automated extraction. The whole method, including the automated DNA extraction and pCS20 Sol1 qPCR, was shown to be sensitive, specific and highly reproducible with the same limit of detection as the combined manual DNA extraction and nested PCR, i.e. 6 copies/reaction. Finally, 96 samples can be tested in one day compared to the four days required for manual DNA extraction and nested PCR.

conclusionsThe adaptation of an automated DNA extraction using a DNA/RNA viral extraction kit for tick samples and the development of a new qPCR increased the accuracy of E. ruminantium epidemiological studies, as well as the diagnostic capabilities and turn-over time for surveillance of heartwater. This new method paves the way for large-scale screening of other bacteria and viruses in ticks as well as genetic characterization of ticks and tick-pathogen coevolution studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutomation, LaboratoryCattleCattle DiseasesDNADNA PrimersEhrlichia ruminantiumHeartwater DiseaseHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysIxodidaeReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityDNADNA PrimersAutomated DNA extractionEhrlichia ruminantiumpCS20qPCRTicks

Identifiers

PMID29132402
PMCPMC5683323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.