Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29132294›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

Artificial selection for odor-guided behavior in Drosophila reveals changes in food consumption.

Elizabeth B Brown, Cody Patterson, Rayanne Pancoast, Stephanie M Rollmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth B BrownDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 45221-0006, USA.
Cody PattersonDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 45221-0006, USA.
Rayanne PancoastDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 45221-0006, USA.
Stephanie M RollmannDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 45221-0006, USA. stephanie.rollmann@uc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4552-5647
University of Cincinnati · USXavier University · US

Funding

Drosophila Transgenic RNAi Resource ProjectR01GM084947 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI PERRIMON, NORBERT · 2008 to 2019
$9.8M
Molecular evolution of odorant receptor specificities in DrosophilaR01GM080592 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI ROLLMANN, STEPHANIE MARIE · 2009 to 2013
$1.4M
National Institutes of Health GM080592National Science Foundation DBI-1262863NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080592NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084947University of Cincinnati Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe olfactory system enables organisms to detect chemical cues in the environment and can signal the availability of food or the presence of a predator. Appropriate behavioral responses to these chemical cues are therefore important for organismal survival and can influence traits such as organismal life span and food consumption. However, understanding the genetic mechanisms underlying odor-guided behavior, correlated responses in other traits, and how these constrain or promote their evolution, remain an important challenge. Here, we performed artificial selection for attractive and aversive behavioral responses to four chemical compounds, two aromatics (4-ethylguaiacol and 4-methylphenol) and two esters (methyl hexanoate and ethyl acetate), for thirty generations.

resultsArtificial selection for odor-guided behavior revealed symmetrical responses to selection for each of the four chemical compounds. We then investigated whether selection for odor-guided behavior resulted in correlated responses in life history traits and/or food consumption. We found changes in food consumption upon selection for behavioral responses to aromatics. In many cases, lines selected for increased attraction to aromatics showed an increase in food consumption. We then performed RNA sequencing of lines selected for responses to 4-ethylguaiacol to identify candidate genes associated with odor-guided behavior and its impact on food consumption. We identified 91 genes that were differentially expressed among lines, many of which were associated with metabolic processes. RNAi-mediated knockdown of select candidate genes further supports their role in odor-guided behavior and/or food consumption.

conclusionsThis study identifies novel genes underlying variation in odor-guided behavior and further elucidates the genetic mechanisms underlying the interrelationship between olfaction and feeding.

Indexed as

OdorantsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDrosophila melanogasterEatingGene Expression ProfilingSmellDrosophilaFeedingOlfactionRNA interferenceRNA sequencing

Identifiers

PMID29132294
PMCPMC5683340
OpenAlexW2770190300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.