Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29131890›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2018

Modeling Inspiratory Flow in a Porcine Lung Airway.

Peshala P T Gamage, Fardin Khalili, M D Khurshidul Azad, Hansen A Mansy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peshala P T GamageBiomedical Acoustics Research Laboratory (BARL), Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Central Florida, ENGR 1, Room 428, 12760 Pegasus Boulevard, Orlando, FL 32816 e-mail: .
Fardin KhaliliBiomedical Acoustics Research Laboratory (BARL), Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Central Florida, ENGR 1, Room 428, 12760 Pegasus Boulevard, Orlando, FL 32816 e-mail: .
M D Khurshidul AzadBiomedical Acoustics Research Laboratory (BARL), Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Central Florida, ENGR 1, Room 428, 12760 Pegasus Boulevard, Orlando, FL 32816 e-mail: .
Hansen A MansyBiomedical Acoustics Research Laboratory (BARL), Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Central Florida, ENGR 1, Room 428, 12760 Pegasus Boulevard, Orlando, FL 32816 e-mail: .

Funding

The Audible Human ProjectR01EB012142 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI ROYSTON, THOMAS J · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
A portable device for ambulatory monitoring of heart failureR43HL099053 · NHLBI · BIOMEDICAL ACOUSTICS RESEARCH COMPANY · PI MANSY, HANSEN A · 2011 to 2011
$339k
NHLBI NIH HHS R43 HL099053NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB012142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inspiratory flow in a multigeneration pig lung airways was numerically studied at a steady inlet flow rate of 3.2 × 10-4 m3/s corresponding to a Reynolds number of 1150 in the trachea. The model was validated by comparing velocity distributions with previous measurements and simulations in simplified airway geometries. Simulation results provided detailed maps of the axial and secondary flow patterns at different cross sections of the airway tree. The vortex core regions in the airways were visualized using absolute helicity values and suggested the presence of secondary flow vortices where two counter-rotating vortices were observed at the main bifurcation and in many other bifurcations. Both laminar and turbulent flows were considered. Results showed that axial and secondary flows were comparable in the laminar and turbulent cases. Turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) vanished in the more distal airways, which indicates that the flow in these airways approaches laminar flow conditions. The simulation results suggested viscous pressure drop values comparable to earlier studies. The monopodial asymmetric nature of airway branching in pigs resulted in airflow patterns that are different from the less asymmetric human airways. The major daughters of the pig airways tended to have high airflow ratios, which may lead to different particle distribution and sound generation patterns. These differences need to be taken into consideration when interpreting the results of animal studies involving pigs before generalizing these results to humans.

Indexed as

InhalationModels, BiologicalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBronchiHumansLungPressureSwineTrachea

Identifiers

PMID29131890
PMCPMC6993782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.