ArticleXenotransplantation2017
Inactivation of porcine endogenous retrovirus in pigs using CRISPR-Cas9, editorial commentary.
Article in Xenotransplantation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Xeno kidney: revolutionizing kidney disease treatment.Frontiers in nephrology · 2026Review
- Porcine xenotransplantation in the clinical era: converging advances and unresolved barriers on the path to clinical translation - a narrative review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Cardiac xenotransplantation: from concept to clinic.Cardiovascular research · 2023Review
- Virus Safety of Xenotransplantation.Viruses · 2022Review
- Article
- Virological and Parasitological Characterization of Mini-LEWE Minipigs Using Improved Screening Methods and an Overview of Data on Various Minipig Breeds.Microorganisms · 2021Article
- Review
- Lipid- and Polymer-Based Nanoparticle Systems for the Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9.Journal of drug delivery science and technology · 2021Article
- Impact of porcine cytomegalovirus on long-term orthotopic cardiac xenotransplant survival.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Article
- Why was PERV not transmitted during preclinical and clinical xenotransplantation trials and after inoculation of animals?Retrovirology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.