Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29131002›Full record

Trial reportMedical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre2017

Low Tidal Volume Positive End-Expiratory Pressure versus High Tidal Volume Zero-Positive End-Expiratory Pressure and Postoperative Pulmonary Functions in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.

Murat Haliloglu, Beliz Bilgili, Mehtap Ozdemir, Tumay Umuroglu, Nurten Bakan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04546932 (Lung-protective Mechanical Ventilation for Patients Undergoing Abdominal Laparoscopic Surgeries), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04546932 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Lung-protective Mechanical Ventilation for Patients Undergoing Abdominal Laparoscopic Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorVietnam Military Medical UniversityRan2020 to 2020Enrolled62ConditionsMechanical Ventilation ComplicationArmsLung-protective mechanical ventilation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Murat Haliloglu
Beliz Bilgili
Mehtap Ozdemir
Tumay Umuroglu
Nurten Bakan
Marmara University · TRÜmraniye Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim was to compare the effects of low tidal volume (VT) and moderate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with high VT and zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) on postoperative pulmonary functions and oxygenation in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. SUBJECTS AND

methodsForty-four patients were randomized into low VT-PEEP and high VT-ZEEP groups. The patients were ventilated with a VT of 6 mL/kg and 8 cm H2O PEEP in the low VT-PEEP group and a VT of 10 mL/kg and 0 cm H2O PEEP in the high VT-ZEEP group. Preoperative and postoperative spirometric measurements were done and chest X-rays were evaluated using the radiological atelectasis score (RAS). p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsThe intraoperative and postoperative arterial partial pressure of oxygen and arterial oxygen saturation values were significantly higher in the low VT-PEEP group than in the high VT-ZEEP group. At all times, the arterial-to-alveolar oxygenation gradients were significantly lower in the low VT-PEEP group than in the high VT-ZEEP group. Preoperative RAS were similar in both groups, but the postoperative RAS was significantly lower in the low VT-PEEP group (p < 0.001). Forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and peak expiratory flow rate recorded postoperatively were significantly lower in the high VT-ZEEP group (p < 0.001).

conclusionsPostoperative pulmonary functions were less impaired in patients ventilated with a VT of 6 mL/kg and 8 cm H2O PEEP than in patients ventilated with a VT of 10 mL/kg and ZEEP.

Indexed as

AgedHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedOxygenPositive-Pressure RespirationPostoperative PeriodProspective StudiesProstatectomyRespiratory Function TestsRobotic Surgical ProceduresTidal VolumeOxygenLow tidal volumePneumoperitoneumPositive end-expiratory pressurePulmonary functionRobot-assisted surgerySteep Trendelenburg

Identifiers

PMID29131002
PMCPMC5848477
OpenAlexW2766580372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.