Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29130934›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation2017

Recurrent ubiquitin B silencing in gynecological cancers establishes dependence on ubiquitin C.

Alexia T Kedves, Scott Gleim, Xiaoyou Liang, Dennis M Bonal, Frederic Sigoillot, Fred Harbinski, Sneha Sanghavi, Christina Benander, Elizabeth George, Prafulla C Gokhale and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. GraphSynergy: a network-inspired deep learning model for anticancer drug combination prediction.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Tools for Decoding Ubiquitin Signaling in DNA Repair.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. The Ubiquitin Gene Expression Pattern and Sensitivity toInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexia T KedvesChemical Biology and Therapeutics, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Scott GleimChemical Biology and Therapeutics, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Xiaoyou LiangChemical Biology and Therapeutics, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Dennis M BonalDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Frederic SigoillotChemical Biology and Therapeutics, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Fred HarbinskiChemical Biology and Therapeutics, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Sneha SanghaviNeurosciences, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Christina BenanderChemical Biology and Therapeutics, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Elizabeth GeorgeChemical Biology and Therapeutics, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Prafulla C GokhaleDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Quang-De NguyenDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Paul T KirschmeierDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Robert J DistelDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jeremy JenkinsChemical Biology and Therapeutics, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael S GoldbergDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
William C ForresterChemical Biology and Therapeutics, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcriptional repression of ubiquitin B (UBB) is a cancer-subtype-specific alteration that occurs in a substantial population of patients with cancers of the female reproductive tract. UBB is 1 of 2 genes encoding for ubiquitin as a polyprotein consisting of multiple copies of ubiquitin monomers. Silencing of UBB reduces cellular UBB levels and results in an exquisite dependence on ubiquitin C (UBC), the second polyubiquitin gene. UBB is repressed in approximately 30% of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) patients and is a recurrent lesion in uterine carcinosarcoma and endometrial carcinoma. We identified ovarian tumor cell lines that retain UBB in a repressed state, used these cell lines to establish orthotopic ovarian tumors, and found that inducible expression of a UBC-targeting shRNA led to tumor regression, and substantial long-term survival benefit. Thus, we describe a recurrent cancer-specific lesion at the level of ubiquitin production. Moreover, these observations reveal the prognostic value of UBB repression and establish UBC as a promising therapeutic target for ovarian cancer patients with recurrent UBB silencing.

Indexed as

Gene SilencingCell Line, TumorFemaleHumansNeoplasm ProteinsOvarian NeoplasmsUbiquitinUbiquitin CNeoplasm ProteinsUBB protein, humanUbiquitinUbiquitin CGeneticsOncologyUbiquitin-proteosome system

Identifiers

PMID29130934
PMCPMC5707153
OpenAlexW2767204302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.