Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29130628›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2018

Characterization of genetic intratumor heterogeneity in colorectal cancer and matching patient-derived spheroid cultures.

Sigrid S Árnadóttir, Maria Jeppesen, Philippe Lamy, Jesper B Bramsen, Iver Nordentoft, Michael Knudsen, Søren Vang, Mogens R Madsen, Ole Thastrup, Jacob Thastrup and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sigrid S ÁrnadóttirDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Maria JeppesenDigestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Philippe LamyDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Jesper B BramsenDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Iver NordentoftDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Michael KnudsenDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Søren VangDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Mogens R MadsenSurgical Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Herning Regional Hospital, Denmark.
Ole Thastrup2cureX, Birkerød, Denmark.
Jacob Thastrup2cureX, Birkerød, Denmark.
Claus L AndersenDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-derived in vitro cultures of colorectal cancer (CRC) may help guide treatment strategies prior to patient treatment. However, most previous studies have been performed on a single biopsy per tumor. The purpose of this study was to analyze multiple spatially distinct biopsies from CRCs and see how well intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) was recapitulated in matching patient-derived spheroids. Three to five biopsies were collected from six CRC tumors. Each biopsy was split in two; one half was used for spheroid culturing, while the other half was used for DNA and RNA purification. For two patients, lymph node metastases were analyzed. Somatic mutations were called from whole exome sequencing data. Each tumor contained mutations shared across all biopsies and spheroids, including major CRC drivers such as APC, KRAS, and TP53. At the same time, all tumors exhibited ITH on both mutation and copy number level. The concordance between biopsies and spheroids ranged between 40 and 70% for coding mutations. For three patients, the biopsy and spheroid from matching areas clustered together, meaning that the spheroid resembled the area of origin more than the other areas. However, all biopsies and spheroids contained private mutations. Therefore, multiple cultures from spatially distinct sites of the tumor increase the insight into the genetic profile of the entire tumor. Molecular subtypes were called from RNA sequencing data. When based on transcripts from both cancer and noncancerous cells, the subtypes were largely independent of sampling site. In contrast, subtyping based on cancer cell transcripts alone was dependent on sample site and genetic ITH. In conclusion, all examined CRC tumors showed genetic ITH. Spheroid cultures partly reflected this ITH, and having multiple cultures from distinct tumor sites improved the representation of the genetic tumor subclones. This should be taken into account when establishing patient-derived models for drug screening.

Indexed as

Genetic HeterogeneityAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyColorectal NeoplasmsExome SequencingFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedMutationPhylogenySequence Analysis, RNASpheroids, Cellularcolorectal cancerintratumor heterogeneitypatient-derived spheroid cultureswhole exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID29130628
PMCPMC5748486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.