Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29130590›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2018

Quantification of GABA, glutamate and glutamine in a single measurement at 3 T using GABA-edited MEGA-PRESS.

Faezeh Sanaei Nezhad, Adriana Anton, Emilia Michou, JeYoung Jung, Laura M Parkes, Stephen R Williams

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Hyperpolarized [5-Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Faezeh Sanaei NezhadCentre for Imaging Science and Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8698-9467
Adriana AntonDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology and Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Emilia MichouSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
JeYoung JungDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology and Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Laura M ParkesDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology and Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6488-507X
Stephen R WilliamsCentre for Imaging Science and Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5940-1675
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

TR&D 4: Algorithms for functional and anatomical brain analysisP41EB015909 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI VAN ZIJL, PETER CM · 2012 to 2020
$13.1M
Universal GABA-edited MRS at 3TR01EB016089 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Richard Anthony Edward Edden · 2013 to 2026
$5.4M
Medical Research Council MR/J004146/1Medical Research Council MR/K020803/1NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015909NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB016089Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate (Glu), major neurotransmitters in the brain, are recycled through glutamine (Gln). All three metabolites can be measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy in vivo, although GABA measurement at 3 T requires an extra editing acquisition, such as Mescher-Garwood point-resolved spectroscopy (MEGA-PRESS). In a GABA-edited MEGA-PRESS spectrum, Glu and Gln co-edit with GABA, providing the possibility to measure all three in one acquisition. In this study, we investigated the reliability of the composite Glu + Gln (Glx) peak estimation and the possibility of Glu and Gln separation in GABA-edited MEGA-PRESS spectra. The data acquired in vivo were used to develop a quality assessment framework which identified MEGA-PRESS spectra in which Glu and Gln could be estimated reliably. Phantoms containing Glu, Gln, GABA and N-acetylaspartate (NAA) at different concentrations were scanned using GABA-edited MEGA-PRESS at 3 T. Fifty-six sets of spectra in five brain regions were acquired from 36 healthy volunteers. Based on the Glu/Gln ratio, data were classified as either within or outside the physiological range. A peak-by-peak quality assessment was performed on all data to investigate whether quality metrics can discriminate between these two classes of spectra. The quality metrics were as follows: the GABA signal-to-noise ratio, the NAA linewidth and the Glx Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB). The Glu and Gln concentrations were estimated with precision across all phantoms with a linear relationship between the measured and true concentrations: R

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultBiomarkersFemalegamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlutamic AcidGlutamineHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhantoms, ImagingYoung AdultBiomarkersgamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlutamic AcidGlutamineGABAglutamateglutamineMEGA-PRESSquantification

Identifiers

PMID29130590
PMCPMC5765428
OpenAlexW2759955182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.