Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29130574›Full record

SynthesisBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2018

Drug interactions between rifamycin antibiotics and hormonal contraception: a systematic review.

K B Simmons, L B Haddad, K Nanda, K M Curtis

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Drug interactions between rifamycin antibiotics and hormonal contraception: a systematic review.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Adolescent tuberculosis.The Lancet. Child & adolescent health · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

K B SimmonsDivision of Reproductive Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
L B HaddadDivision of Reproductive Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
K NandaFHI 360, Durham, NC, USA.
K M CurtisDivision of Reproductive Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USFamily Health International 360 · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRifamycin antibiotics are commonly used for treatment of tuberculosis, but may reduce the effectiveness of hormonal contraception (HC).

objectivesTo determine whether interactions between rifamycins and HC result in decreased effectiveness or increased toxicity of either therapy. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane and clinicaltrials.gov through May 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included trials, cohort, and case-control studies addressing pregnancy rates, pharmacodynamics or pharmacokinetic (PK) outcomes when HC and rifamycins were administered together versus apart. Of 7291 original records identified, 11 met inclusion criteria after independent review by two authors. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently abstracted study details and assessed study quality using the United States Preventive Services Task Force grading system. Findings are reported descriptively. MAIN

resultsStudies only addressed combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and none reported pregnancy rates. Quality ranged from good to poor. Rifampin increased the frequency of ovulation in two of four studies, and reduced estrogen and/or progestin exposure in five studies. Rifabutin led to smaller PK changes than rifampin in two studies. In one study each, rifaximin and rifalazil did not alter hormone PK.

conclusionsNo studies evaluated pregnancy risk or non-oral HCs. PK and ovulation outcomes support a clinically concerning drug interaction between COCs and rifampin, and to a lesser extent rifabutin. Data are limited for other rifamycins. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Rifampin and rifabutin reduce systemic exposure of oral contraceptives, but no studies have evaluated pregnancy risk.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsContraceptives, Oral, CombinedDrug InteractionsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOvulationPregnancyRifabutinRifamycinsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsContraceptives, Oral, CombinedRifabutinRifamycinsantibioticscontraceptive effectivenesscontraceptive failuredrug exposuredrug interactions hormonal contraceptionovulationrifabutinrifampinrifamycinstuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID29130574
PMCPMC11283817
OpenAlexW2767664616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.