Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29129532›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2017

Idiosyncratic Genome Degradation in a Bacterial Endosymbiont of Periodical Cicadas.

Matthew A Campbell, Piotr Łukasik, Chris Simon, John P McCutcheon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sensitive and error-tolerant annotation of protein-coding DNA with BATH.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Genetic innovations in animal-microbe symbioses.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. A new protein protects a symbiotic relationship.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew A CampbellDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, MT 59812, USA.
Piotr ŁukasikDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, MT 59812, USA.
Chris SimonDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, 75 N Eagleville Road Unit 3043, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
John P McCutcheonDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, MT 59812, USA. Electronic address: john.mccutcheon@umontana.edu.

Funding

NASA NNA17BB05A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When a free-living bacterium transitions to a host-beneficial endosymbiotic lifestyle, it almost invariably loses a large fraction of its genome [1, 2]. The resulting small genomes often become stable in size, structure, and coding capacity [3-5], as exemplified by Sulcia muelleri, a nutritional endosymbiont of cicadas. Sulcia's partner endosymbiont, Hodgkinia cicadicola, similarly remains co-linear in some cicadas diverged by millions of years [6, 7]. But in the long-lived periodical cicada Magicicada tredecim, the Hodgkinia genome has split into dozens of tiny, gene-sparse circles that sometimes reside in distinct Hodgkinia cells [8]. Previous data suggested that all other Magicicada species harbor complex Hodgkinia populations, but the timing, number of origins, and outcomes of the splitting process were unknown. Here, by sequencing Hodgkinia metagenomes from the remaining six Magicicada and two sister species, we show that each Magicicada species harbors Hodgkinia populations of at least 20 genomic circles. We find little synteny among the 256 Hodgkinia circles analyzed except between the most closely related cicada species. Gene phylogenies show multiple Hodgkinia lineages in the common ancestor of Magicicada and its closest known relatives but that most splitting has occurred within Magicicada and has given rise to highly variable Hodgkinia gene dosages among species. These data show that Hodgkinia genome degradation has proceeded down different paths in different Magicicada species and support a model of genomic degradation that is stochastic in outcome and nonadaptive for the host. These patterns mirror the genomic instability seen in some mitochondria.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaBiological EvolutionDNA, CircularGenome, BacterialGenomicsHemipteraPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNASymbiosisDNA, CircularendosymbiosisHodgkinia cicadicolalevels of selectionMagicicadamutationnonadaptive evolutionorganelle genomesperiodical cicadas

Identifiers

PMID29129532
PMCPMC8879801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.