Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29129190›Full record

Trial reportJournal of substance abuse treatment2017

Moderators of sudden gains after sessions addressing emotion regulation among women in treatment for alcohol use.

Cathryn Glanton Holzhauer, Elizabeth E Epstein, Jumi Hayaki, James S Marinchak, Barbara S McCrady, Sharon M Cook

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Treatment Interventions for Women With Alcohol Use Disorder.Alcohol research : current reviews · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cathryn Glanton HolzhauerUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, 365 Plantation Street, Worcester, MA 01605, USA. Electronic address: cathryn.holzhauer@umassmed.edu.
Elizabeth E EpsteinUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, 365 Plantation Street, Worcester, MA 01605, USA; Center of Alcohol Studies, Rutgers University, 607 Allison Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Jumi HayakiCollege of the Holy Cross, 1 College Street, Worcester, MA 01610, USA.
James S MarinchakVA Connecticut Healthcare System, Newington Campus, 555 Willard Ave, Newington, CT 06111, USA.
Barbara S McCradyCenter of Alcohol Studies, Rutgers University, 607 Allison Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, 2650 Yale Blvd. SE, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA.
Sharon M CookCenter of Alcohol Studies, Rutgers University, 607 Allison Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.

Funding

Testing CBT models and change mechanisms for Alcohol Dependent WomenR01AA017163 · NIAAA · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI EPSTEIN, ELIZABETH ELLEN · 2008 to 2012
$3.5M
TESTING ALCOHOL BEHAVIORAL COUPLES THERAPY FOR WOMENR01AA007070 · NIAAA · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI EPSTEIN, ELIZABETH E · 1988 to 2007
$596k
CSRD VA IK2 CX001951NIAAA NIH HHS L30 AA025236NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA007070NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA017163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sudden gains (SGs) are defined as abrupt and significant improvements in mental health symptoms that occur between two psychotherapy sessions. Preliminary evidence suggests that SGs may be an important pattern of symptom reduction in the treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD) (i.e., a steep between-session reduction in drinking or alcohol craving frequency or intensity) (Drapkin, Epstein, McCrady, & Eddie, 2015). The current study examined SGs within two randomized clinical trials (RCTs) testing female-specific cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) protocol for AUD (n=146). We tested a priori hypotheses about whether women's baseline depression, anxiety, and confidence to be abstinent while in a negative emotional state would predict attainment of SGs after attending sessions that addressed depression, anxiety, and emotion regulation (i.e., sessions five and six of the 12-session protocol). Data were collected at baseline, within treatment, and 15months after baseline. Results showed that women with high levels of depression and/or anxiety and low confidence to be abstinent in a negative emotional state at baseline were more likely to experience a SG (steep decrease in drinking) after sessions five and six (p=0.02). Further, among women with high levels of depression and/or anxiety at baseline, those who experienced both a SG in drinking after session five/six and had higher confidence to remain abstinent in a negative emotional state at the end of treatment reported lower drinking frequency at 9- but not 15-month follow-up [95% CI=(-2.65, -0.86)]. Findings support the value of providing interventions targeting mood and emotion regulation in AUD treatment for women.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CarePsychotherapeutic ProcessesSelf-ControlAdultAlcoholismAnxietyCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionEmotionsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedAlcoholAnxietyDepressionSudden gainsWomen

Identifiers

PMID29129190
PMCPMC5728387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.