Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29128881›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2017

Disparities in Geographic Accessibility of National Cancer Institute Cancer Centers in the United States.

Yanqing Xu, Cong Fu, Tracy Onega, Xun Shi, Fahui Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Geographic Access to Fertility Counseling among Adolescent and Young Adult Women with Cancer in North Carolina.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Improving Rural Clinical Trial Enrollment: Recommendations From the Rural Health Working Group of the Alliance Clinical Trials Network.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Organization of Cancer Specialists in US Physician Practices and Health Systems.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yanqing XuUniversity of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.
Cong FuMetro Engineering Solutions, Corby Energy Services, Detroit, MI, USA.
Tracy OnegaGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
Xun ShiDartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Fahui WangLouisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA. fwang@lsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7765-3024

Funding

Automated Delineation of Cancer Service AreasR21CA212687 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI ONEGA, TRACY, WANG, FAHUI · 2017 to 2018
$392k
NCI NIH HHS 1R21CA212687-01A1NCI NIH HHS R21 CA212687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Cancer Centers form the backbone of the cancer care system in the United States since their inception in the early 1970s. Most studies on their geographic accessibility used primitive measures, and did not examine the disparities across urbanicity or demographic groups. This research uses an advanced accessibility method, termed "2-step floating catchment area (2SFCA)" and implemented in Geographic Information Systems (GIS), to capture the degree of geographic access to NCI Cancer Centers by accounting for competition intensity for the services and travel time between residents and the facilities. The results indicate that urban advantage is pronounced as the average accessibility is highest in large central metro areas, declines to large fringe metro, medium metro, small metro, micropolitan and noncore rural areas. Population under the poverty line are disproportionally concentrated in lower accessibility areas. However, on average Non-Hispanic White have the lowest geographic accessibility, followed by Hispanic, Non-Hispanic Black and Asian, and the differences are statistically significant. The "reversed racial disadvantage" in NCI Cancer Center accessibility seems counterintuitive but is consistent with an influential prior study; and it is in contrast to the common observation of co-location of concentration of minority groups and people under the poverty line.

Indexed as

Geographic Information SystemsGeographic MappingHealth Services AccessibilityHumansNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)NeoplasmsPovertyRacial GroupsResidence CharacteristicsTransportationUnited States2-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) methodCancer careDisparityGeographic accessNational Cancer Institute Cancer CentersReversed racial disadvantageWeighted ordinary-least-squares regression

Identifiers

PMID29128881
PMCPMC8208496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.