ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2017
CT guided appendicectomy incision: A prospective case series.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveSeveral radiological studies have suggested that the base of the Appendix often does not correspond with Mc Burney's point. The aim of our study is to assess the value of using CT localization of the appendicocaecal junction to guide placement of the appendicectomy incision. DESIGN &
method32 consecutive patients, booked for open appendicectomy were prospectively included in this study. Coronal and axial CT scans with IV contrast were studied to assess site of the appendicocaecal junction. This information was used to guide placement of the incision.
results28 out of 32 patients studied, the appendicocaecal junctions were accurately identified. It was noted that the final incision sites were cephalad to Mc Burney's point in 8, at the point in 3 and caudal in 17. In 1 patient, it was necessary to extend the incision medially by 2cm to retrieve the distal Appendix which had been detached through the site of rupture.
conclusionMc Burney's point often does not correspond to the base of the appendix. We propose that using CT imaging to guide the appendicectomy incision is safe, facilitates locating the Appendix at surgery, minimizes incision size and decreases the need to extend it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.