Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29128409›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2018

Breast cancer related perceptions and practices of health professionals working in Brazil's network of primary care units.

Benjamin D Hallowell, Douglas M Puricelli Perin, Eduardo J Simoes, Diana C Paez, Diana C Parra, Ross C Brownson, Mona Saraiya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Benjamin D HallowellDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Douglas M Puricelli PerinDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Eduardo J SimoesDepartment of Health Management and Informatics, University of Missouri School of Medicine, One Hospital Drive, CE707 CS&E Bldg, Columbia, MO 65212, United States.
Diana C PaezPrevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, United States.
Diana C ParraPrevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, United States.
Ross C BrownsonPrevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, United States; Department of Surgery and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, United States.
Mona SaraiyaDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States. Electronic address: yzs2@cdc.gov.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2004 the Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA) established breast cancer screening guidelines for women in Brazil: annual clinical breast exam for women age 40-49 and biennial mammogram for women age 50-69. Healthcare provider's adherence to these guidelines is currently unknown. The objective of this study is to describe the perceptions and practices related to breast cancer screening among physicians, nurses, and health unit coordinators working in the network of primary healthcare units (HCUs) in Brazil. In 2011, 1600 primary HCUs were randomly sampled from all regions in Brazil. At each HCU the coordinator and one health professional were asked to participate in a telephone survey to gathered information on their knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to breast cancer screening. Participation rates for coordinators, physicians, and nurses were 78%, 34%, and 65% respectively. Health unit coordinators identified numerous barriers that prevent patients from receiving appropriate screening, many (44%) were unaware of INCA cancer screening guidelines. Despite a high perceived impact of INCA guidelines, a majority of physicians and nurses did not follow them. Most physicians and nurses recommended mammograms on an annual basis (~75%) and 50.9% of nurses and 25.1% of physicians initiated routine breast cancer screening in women under age 40. Physicians and nurses in Brazil screen at younger ages and more frequently than recommended by INCA guidelines. Given that primary HCUs are the source of health care for many women, interventions that educate healthcare providers on the appropriate ages and intervals for breast cancer screening may prove useful.

Indexed as

PerceptionAttitude of Health PersonnelBrazilBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGuideline AdherenceHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMammographyPrimary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesBrazilBreastBreast cancerBreast cancer screeningCancer screeningClinical breast examMammographyNursePhysician

Identifiers

PMID29128409
PMCPMC5813797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.