Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29127948›Full record

SynthesisJAMA2017

Association of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Concentration With Cardiac Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Andrew R Chapman, Kuan Ken Lee, David A McAllister, Louise Cullen, Jaimi H Greenslade, William Parsonage, Andrew Worster, Peter A Kavsak, Stefan Blankenberg, Johannes Neumann and 27 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 101 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05532787 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Accelerated Diagnostic Pathways for Acute Chest Pain (EDACS & HEART Pathway) in Emergency Departments of the United Arab Emirates: A Multi-Center Prospective Study

TypeobservationalSponsorZayed Military HospitalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled1,200ConditionsAcute Coronary Syndrome, Chest PainArmsApplication of acute chest pain risk stratification scores (HEART and EDACS)
NCT05748691 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Trial of Switching High-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Assays in Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome: an Interrupted Time Series Analysis (TWITCH-ED Study)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of EdinburghRan2020 to 2023Enrolled26,000ConditionsAcute Coronary Syndrome, Acute Myocardial Infarction, Acute Myocardial Ischemia, Myocardial InjuryArmsClinical implementation of hs-cTnT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors.

Andrew R ChapmanBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Kuan Ken LeeBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
David A McAllisterInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Louise CullenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Jaimi H GreensladeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
William ParsonageDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Andrew WorsterDivision of Emergency Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Peter A KavsakDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Stefan BlankenbergUniversity Heart Center, Hamburg, Germany.
Johannes NeumannUniversity Heart Center, Hamburg, Germany.
Nils A SörensenUniversity Heart Center, Hamburg, Germany.
Dirk WestermannUniversity Heart Center, Hamburg, Germany.
Madelon M BuijsAtalmedial Diagnostic Centers, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands.
Gerard J E VerdelDepartment of Cardiology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands.
John W PickeringDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Martin P ThanEmergency Department, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Raphael TwerenboldCardiovascular Research Institute Basel and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Patrick BadertscherCardiovascular Research Institute Basel and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Zaid SabtiCardiovascular Research Institute Basel and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Christian MuellerCardiovascular Research Institute Basel and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
Atul AnandBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Philip AdamsonBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Fiona E StrachanBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Amy FerryBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Dennis SandemanBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Alasdair GrayBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Richard BodyCentral Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Manchester, Manchester, England.
Brian KeevilUniversity Hospital South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England.
Edward CarltonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, England.
Kim GreavesDepartment of Cardiology, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, University of the Sunshine Coast, Birtinya, Australia.
Frederick K KorleyUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Thomas S MetkusJohn Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Yader SandovalHennepin County Medical Center and Minneapolis Heart Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Fred S AppleDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Hennepin County Medical Center and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
David E NewbyBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Anoop S V ShahBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Nicholas L MillsBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.

Funding

Predicting Incident Stroke Using Blood Biomarkers of Brain InjuryR21HL140274 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KORLEY, FREDERICK KOFI · 2017 to 2018
$262k
British Heart Foundation FS/16/14/32023British Heart Foundation FS/16/75/32533British Heart Foundation PG/15/51/31596British Heart Foundation SP/12/10/29922Chief Scientist Office HICG/1/40Department of Health PDF-2012-05-193Wellcome Trust 201492/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I testing is widely used to evaluate patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. A cardiac troponin concentration of less than 5 ng/L identifies patients at presentation as low risk, but the optimal threshold is uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the performance of a cardiac troponin I threshold of 5 ng/L at presentation as a risk stratification tool in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Data Sources: Systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases from January 1, 2006, to March 18, 2017. Study Selection: Prospective studies measuring high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I concentrations in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome in which the diagnosis was adjudicated according to the universal definition of myocardial infarction. Data Extraction and Synthesis: The systematic review identified 19 cohorts. Individual patient-level data were obtained from the corresponding authors of 17 cohorts, with aggregate data from 2 cohorts. Meta-estimates for primary and secondary outcomes were derived using a binomial-normal random-effects model. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was myocardial infarction or cardiac death at 30 days. Performance was evaluated in subgroups and across a range of troponin concentrations (2-16 ng/L) using individual patient data. Results: Of 11 845 articles identified, 104 underwent full-text review, and 19 cohorts from 9 countries were included. Among 22 457 patients included in the meta-analysis (mean age, 62 [SD, 15.5] years; n = 9329 women [41.5%]), the primary outcome occurred in 2786 (12.4%). Cardiac troponin I concentrations were less than 5 ng/L at presentation in 11 012 patients (49%), in whom there were 60 missed index or 30-day events (59 index myocardial infarctions, 1 myocardial infarction at 30 days, and no cardiac deaths at 30 days). This resulted in a negative predictive value of 99.5% (95% CI, 99.3%-99.6%) for the primary outcome. There were no cardiac deaths at 30 days and 7 (0.1%) at 1 year, with a negative predictive value of 99.9% (95% CI, 99.7%-99.9%) for cardiac death. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome, a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I concentration of less than 5 ng/L identified those at low risk of myocardial infarction or cardiac death within 30 days. Further research is needed to understand the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of this approach to risk stratification.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAdultBiomarkersDeathHumansMaleMyocardial InfarctionPrognosisProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentTroponin IBiomarkersTroponin I

Identifiers

PMID29127948
PMCPMC5710293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.