ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2017
Effective prediction of bacterial type IV secreted effectors by combined features of both C-termini and N-termini.
Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- GeoEPred: A multimodal structure-aware geometric deep learning framework for Gram-negative bacterial secreted effector prediction with sequence semantics.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- DeepSecE: A Deep-Learning-Based Framework for Multiclass Prediction of Secreted Proteins in Gram-Negative Bacteria.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Article
- Microbial Effectors: Key Determinants in Plant Health and Disease.Microorganisms · 2022Review
- Protein-Specific Prediction of RNA-Binding Sites Based on Information Entropy.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- iT4SE-EP: Accurate Identification of Bacterial Type IV Secreted Effectors by Exploring Evolutionary Features from Two PSI-BLAST Profiles.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Computational prediction of secreted proteins in gram-negative bacteria.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- DeepT3_4: A Hybrid Deep Neural Network Model for the Distinction Between Bacterial Type III and IV Secreted Effectors.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Variable selection from a feature representing protein sequences: a case of classification on bacterial type IV secreted effectors.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- T4SE-XGB: Interpretable Sequence-Based Prediction of Type IV Secreted Effectors Using eXtreme Gradient Boosting Algorithm.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Individually double minimum-distance definition of protein-RNA binding residues and application to structure-based prediction.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2018Article
- PredT4SE-Stack: Prediction of Bacterial Type IV Secreted Effectors From Protein Sequences Using a Stacked Ensemble Method.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Various bacterial pathogens can deliver their secreted substrates also called as effectors through type IV secretion systems (T4SSs) into host cells and cause diseases. Since T4SS secreted effectors (T4SEs) play important roles in pathogen-host interactions, identifying them is crucial to our understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms of T4SSs. A few computational methods using machine learning algorithms for T4SEs prediction have been developed by using features of C-terminal residues. However, recent studies have shown that targeting information can also be encoded in the N-terminal region of at least some T4SEs. In this study, we present an effective method for T4SEs prediction by novelly integrating both N-terminal and C-terminal sequence information. First, we collected a comprehensive dataset across multiple bacterial species of known T4SEs and non-T4SEs from literatures. Then, three types of distinctive features, namely amino acid composition, composition, transition and distribution and position-specific scoring matrices were calculated for 50 N-terminal and 100 C-terminal residues. After that, we employed information gain represent to rank the importance score of the 150 different position residues for T4SE secretion signaling. At last, 125 distinctive position residues were singled out for the prediction model to classify T4SEs and non-T4SEs. The support vector machine model yields a high receiver operating curve of 0.916 in the fivefold cross-validation and an accuracy of 85.29% for the independent test set.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29127583What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.