Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29127492›Full record

Trial reportJournal of anesthesia2018

Effect of dexmedetomidine for attenuation of propofol injection pain in electroconvulsive therapy: a randomized controlled study.

Xiang Li, Chao-Jin Chen, Fang Tan, Jing-Ru Pan, Ji-Bin Xing, Qian-Qian Zhu, Zi-Qing Hei, Shao-Li Zhou

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of anesthesia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiang LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 600 Tianhe Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Chao-Jin ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 600 Tianhe Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Fang TanDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 600 Tianhe Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jing-Ru PanDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 600 Tianhe Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ji-Bin XingDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 600 Tianhe Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Qian-Qian ZhuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 600 Tianhe Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zi-Qing HeiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 600 Tianhe Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Shao-Li ZhouDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 600 Tianhe Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. zsl13610272308@163.com.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCurrent analgesic strategies for propofol injection pain may cause adverse reactions during electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), such as shortening seizure duration. This study investigated whether dexmedetomidine could attenuate propofol injection pain in ECT.

methodsParticipants were randomly allocated to receive 0.2 μg/kg dexmedetomidine (Dex-0.2 group), 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine (Dex-0.5 group) or saline (control group) prior to ECT. The composite pain scale and objective Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) were used to measure the intensity of injection pain, and the percentage of patients with pain score > 2 was the primary outcome.

resultsOf 137 patients recruited, 46 were assigned to each of the Dex-0.2 or Dex-0.5 groups, while 45 were in the control group. The percentage of pain score > 2 was reduced from 68.9% (31/45) in the control group to 34.8% (16/46) in the Dex-0.2 group (P < 0.001) and 15.2% (7/46) in the Dex-0.5 group (P < 0.001). The pain score and SPI at 5 s after propofol injection were greater in the control group than in the Dex-0.2 [pain scores 3 (2-4) vs. 1 (1-3), P < 0.001, SPI 76.6 ± 10.0 vs. 58.0 ± 11.0, P < 0.001] and Dex-0.5 groups [pain scores 3 (2-4) vs. 1 (0-1), P < 0.001, SPI 76.6 ± 10.0 vs. 51.2 ± 12.3, P < 0.001]. There were no significant differences in seizure duration between the three groups. No patients developed bradycardia and hypotension.

conclusionsPretreatment with dexmedetomidine was able to reduce the propofol injection pain in ECT without interfering with the seizure duration and causing adverse effects such as bradycardia and hypotension. In addition, close monitoring of hemodynamic variables and preparation of a treatment plan and drugs for bradycardia are essential.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnalgesicsDexmedetomidineDouble-Blind MethodElectroconvulsive TherapyFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesMalePainPain MeasurementPropofolYoung AdultAnalgesicsDexmedetomidineHypnotics and SedativesPropofolAngialgiaDexmedetomidineElectroconvulsive therapyPropofol

Identifiers

PMID29127492
OpenAlexW2767769442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.