Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29127432›Full record

Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2017

Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss 3 Years After Successful Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in the Cornea Preservation Time Study: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jonathan Lass, Beth Ann Benetz, David D Verdier, Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn, Allison R Ayala, Wendi Liang, Anthony J Aldave, Steven P Dunn, Tryone McCall, Shahzad I Mian and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01537393 (Effect of Corneal Preservation Time on Long-Term Graft Success), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01537393 phase4completednot on this map

Effect of Corneal Preservation Time on Long-Term Graft Success

TypeinterventionalSponsorCase Western Reserve UniversityRan2012 to 2017Enrolled1,174ConditionsCornea Preservation Time, Endothelial Keratoplasty, Transplant Success, Endothelial Cell DensityArmsCornea tissue transplant
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Jonathan LassDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
Beth Ann BenetzDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
David D VerdierVerdier Eye Center, Grand Rapids, Michigan
Loretta B Szczotka-FlynnDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
Allison R AyalaJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
Wendi LiangJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
Anthony J AldaveStein Eye Institute, UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles)
Steven P DunnMichigan Cornea Consultants, PC, Southfield
Tryone McCallCornea Associates of Texas, Dallas
Shahzad I MianKellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Lisa C NavarroFocal Point Vision, San Antonio, Texas
Sanjay V PatelDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
Sudeep PramanikMid Atlantic Cornea Consultants, Baltimore, Maryland
George O RosenwasserCentral Pennsylvania Eye Center, Hershey
Kevin W RossEversight, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Mark A TerryDevers Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon
Craig KollmanJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
Robin L GalJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
Roy W BeckJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
Cornea Preservation Time Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Demonstrating that endothelial cell loss following Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) is independent of donor cornea preservation time (PT) could increase the pool of corneal tissue available for keratoplasty. Objective: To determine whether endothelial cell loss 3 years after successful DSAEK is related to PT. Design, Setting, and Participants: A multicenter, double-masked, randomized clinical trial included 40 clinical sites (70 surgeons) in the United States, with donor corneas provided by 23 US eye banks. A total of 945 eyes of 769 participants were included in the Cornea Preservation Time Study that had not experienced graft failure 3 years after DSAEK, performed primarily for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (96% of the cohort). The study was conducted from April 16, 2012, to June 5, 2017. Interventions: DSAEK with random assignment of a donor cornea with PT of 0 to 7 days (0-7d PT) or 8 to 14 days (8-14d PT). Main Outcomes and Measures: Endothelial cell density (ECD) at 3 years determined by a central image analysis reading center from clinical specular or confocal central endothelial images. Results: Nine hundred forty-five eyes of 769 participants (median age, 70 years [range, 42-90 years], 60.8% women, 93.0% white) in the Cornea Preservation Time Study that had not experienced graft failure 3 years after DSAEK were included. At the initial eye bank tissue screening, mean (SD) central ECD was 2746 (297) cells/mm2 in the 0-7d PT group (n = 485) and 2723 (284) cells/mm2 in the 8-14d PT group (n = 460). At 3 years, the mean (SD) ECD decreased from baseline by 37% (21%) in the 0-7d PT group and 40% (22%) in the 8-14d PT group to 1722 (626) cells/mm2 and 1642 (631) cells/mm2, respectively (mean difference, 73 cells/mm2; 95% CI, 8-138 cells/mm2; P = .03). When analyzed as a continuous variable (days), longer PT was associated with lower ECD (mean difference by days, 15 cells/mm2; 95% CI, 4-26 cells/mm2; P = .006). Endothelial cell loss (ECL) was comparable from 4 to 13 days’ PT (n = 878; 36%-43% when tabulated by day). Available extension study ECD results at 4 years mirrored those at 3 years in the 203 eyes in the 0-7d PT group (mean [SD] ECD, 1620 [673] cells/mm2 and mean [SD] ECL, 41% [23%]) and 209 eyes in the 8-14d PT group (mean [SD] ECD, 1537 [683] cells/mm2 and mean [SD] ECL, 44% [23%]) (mean difference, 112 cells/mm2; 95% CI, 5-219 cells/mm2; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: Although ECL 3 years after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty is greater with longer PT, the effect of PT on ECL is comparable from 4 to 13 days’ PT.

Indexed as

CorneaCryopreservationOrgan PreservationPostoperative ComplicationsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCell CountCorneal Endothelial Cell LossDescemet Stripping Endothelial KeratoplastyDouble-Blind MethodEndothelium, CornealFemaleFuchs' Endothelial DystrophyGraft SurvivalHumans

Identifiers

PMID29127432
PMCPMC6583548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.