Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29127431›Full record

Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2017

Effect of Cornea Preservation Time on Success of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

George O Rosenwasser, Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn, Allison R Ayala, Wendi Liang, Anthony J Aldave, Steven P Dunn, Tyrone McCall, Lisa C Navarro, Sudeep Pramanik, Kevin W Ross and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01537393 (Effect of Corneal Preservation Time on Long-Term Graft Success), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01537393 phase4completednot on this map

Effect of Corneal Preservation Time on Long-Term Graft Success

TypeinterventionalSponsorCase Western Reserve UniversityRan2012 to 2017Enrolled1,174ConditionsCornea Preservation Time, Endothelial Keratoplasty, Transplant Success, Endothelial Cell DensityArmsCornea tissue transplant
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Corneal Donation: Current Guidelines and Future Direction.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

George O RosenwasserCentral Pennsylvania Eye Center, Hershey
Loretta B Szczotka-FlynnDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
Allison R AyalaJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
Wendi LiangJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
Anthony J AldaveStein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles
Steven P DunnMichigan Cornea Consultants, Southfield
Tyrone McCallCornea Associates of Texas, Dallas
Lisa C NavarroFocal Point Vision, San Antonio, Texas
Sudeep PramanikMid Atlantic Cornea Consultants, Baltimore, Maryland
Kevin W RossEversight, Ann Arbor, Michigan
R Doyle StultingWoolfson Eye Institute, Atlanta, Georgia
Mark A TerryDevers Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon
Elmer Y TuUniversity of Illinois Chicago Eye and Ear Infirmary, Chicago
David D VerdierVerdier Eye Center, Grand Rapids, Michigan
Craig KollmanJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
Robin L GalJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
Roy W BeckJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida
Jonathan H LassDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
Cornea Preservation Time Study Group
Jaeb Center for Health Research · USUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · USCornea Associates of Texas · USHershey (United States) · USLegacy Health · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USWoolfson Eye Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Demonstrating that success of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty is similar across donor cornea preservation times (PTs) could increase the donor pool. Objective: To determine whether the 3-year rate of graft success using corneal donor tissue preserved 8 to 14 days is noninferior to that of donor tissue preserved 7 days or less. Design, Setting, and Participants: A multicenter, double-masked, randomized noninferiority clinical trial was conducted from April 16, 2012, to June 5, 2017, at 40 clinical sites (70 surgeons) in the United States, with donor corneas provided by 23 US eye banks. A total of 1090 individuals (1330 study eyes) underwent Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (1255 eyes [94.4%] for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy). Interventions: Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with random assignment of a donor cornea with a PT of 7 days or less (0-7d PT) or 8 to 14 days (8-14d PT). Main Outcomes and Measures: Graft success at 3 years. Results: Of the 1090 participants (1330 study eyes; 60.2% women and 39.8% men; median age at enrollment, 70 years [range, 42-90 years]), the 3-year cumulative probability of graft success was 95.3% (95% CI, 93.6%-96.9%) in the 0-7d PT group and 92.1% (95% CI, 89.9%-94.2%) in the 8-14d PT group (difference, 3.2%). The upper limit of the 1-sided 95% CI on the difference was 5.4%, exceeding the prespecified noninferiority limit of 4%. The difference was mostly owing to more primary donor failures in the 8-14d PT group, with the conditional probability of failure after the first month being 2.4% in the 0-7d PT group and 3.1% in the 8-14d PT group. In preplanned secondary analyses, longer PT was associated with a lower rate of graft success (unadjusted hazard ratio for graft failure per additional day of PT, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.18; P = .008 [PT analyzed as days]), with success rates of 96.5% (95% CI, 92.3%-98.4%) for PT of 4 days or less, 94.9% (95% CI, 92.5%-96.6%) for PT of 5 to 7 days, 93.8% (95% CI, 91.0%-95.8%) for PT of 8 to 11 days, and 89.3% (95% CI, 84.4%-92.7%) for PT of 12 to 14 days (P = .01 [PT analyzed as categorical variable]). Conclusions and Relevance: The 3-year success rate in eyes undergoing Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty was high irrespective of PT. However, the study was unable to conclude that the success rate with donor corneas preserved 8 to 14 days was similar to that of corneas preserved 7 days or less with respect to the prespecified noninferiority limit. Although longer PT was associated with a lower success rate, the difference in rates was small when PT was less than 12 days.

Indexed as

CorneaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCell CountCorneal Endothelial Cell LossCryopreservationDescemet Stripping Endothelial KeratoplastyDouble-Blind MethodEndothelium, CornealEye BanksFemaleFuchs' Endothelial DystrophyGraft SurvivalHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID29127431
PMCPMC6583547
OpenAlexW2767508731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.