Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29127429›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

A high-density consensus linkage map of white lupin highlights synteny with narrow-leafed lupin and provides markers tagging key agronomic traits.

Michał Książkiewicz, Nelson Nazzicari, Hua'an Yang, Matthew N Nelson, Daniel Renshaw, Sandra Rychel, Barbara Ferrari, Maria Carelli, Magdalena Tomaszewska, Stanisław Stawiński and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Functional Genomics: From Soybean to Legume.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genome-Wide Association Study for Nodule Traits in Guar.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Michał KsiążkiewiczInstitute of Plant Genetics Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszyńska 34, 60-479, Poznań, Poland. mksi@igr.poznan.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-3382-8504
Nelson NazzicariCREA-FLC, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Fodder Crops and Dairy Production, Viale Piacenza 29, 26900, Lodi, Italy.
Hua'an YangDepartment of Agriculture and Food Western Australia, 3 Baron-Hay Court, South Perth, 6151, Australia.
Matthew N NelsonNatural Capital and Plant Health, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Wakehurst Place, Ardingly, West Sussex, RH17 6TN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6766-4117
Daniel RenshawDepartment of Agriculture and Food Western Australia, 3 Baron-Hay Court, South Perth, 6151, Australia.
Sandra RychelInstitute of Plant Genetics Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszyńska 34, 60-479, Poznań, Poland.
Barbara FerrariCREA-FLC, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Fodder Crops and Dairy Production, Viale Piacenza 29, 26900, Lodi, Italy.
Maria CarelliCREA-FLC, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Fodder Crops and Dairy Production, Viale Piacenza 29, 26900, Lodi, Italy.
Magdalena TomaszewskaInstitute of Plant Genetics Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszyńska 34, 60-479, Poznań, Poland.
Stanisław StawińskiPlant Breeding Smolice Ltd., Przebędowo 1, Murowana Goślina, 62-095, Poland.
Barbara NaganowskaInstitute of Plant Genetics Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszyńska 34, 60-479, Poznań, Poland.
Bogdan WolkoInstitute of Plant Genetics Polish Academy of Sciences, Strzeszyńska 34, 60-479, Poznań, Poland.
Paolo AnnicchiaricoCREA-FLC, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Fodder Crops and Dairy Production, Viale Piacenza 29, 26900, Lodi, Italy.
Institute of Plant Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences · PLCereal Research Centre · ITGovernment of Western Australia · AUThe University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

White lupin (Lupinus albus L.) is a valuable source of seed protein, carbohydrates and oil, but requires genetic improvement to attain its agronomic potential. This study aimed to (i) develop a new high-density consensus linkage map based on new, transcriptome-anchored markers; (ii) map four important agronomic traits, namely, vernalization requirement, seed alkaloid content, and resistance to anthracnose and Phomopsis stem blight; and, (iii) define regions of synteny between the L. albus and narrow-leafed lupin (L. angustifolius L.) genomes. Mapping of white lupin quantitative trait loci (QTLs) revealed polygenic control of vernalization responsiveness and anthracnose resistance, as well as a single locus regulating seed alkaloid content. We found high sequence collinearity between white and narrow-leafed lupin genomes. Interestingly, the white lupin QTLs did not correspond to previously mapped narrow-leafed lupin loci conferring vernalization independence, anthracnose resistance, low alkaloids and Phomopsis stem blight resistance, highlighting different genetic control of these traits. Our suite of allele-sequenced and PCR validated markers tagging these QTLs is immediately applicable for marker-assisted selection in white lupin breeding. The consensus map constitutes a platform for synteny-based gene cloning approaches and can support the forthcoming white lupin genome sequencing efforts.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenetic LinkageGenome, PlantQuantitative Trait LociLupinusPlant BreedingPlant Leaves

Identifiers

PMID29127429
PMCPMC5681670
OpenAlexW2767877220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.