Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29127303›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Comprehensive genomic analysis of Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma reveals clinical relevance.

Peina Du, Peide Huang, Xuanlin Huang, Xiangchun Li, Zhimin Feng, Fengyu Li, Shaoguang Liang, Yongmei Song, Jan Stenvang, Nils Brünner and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The consensus molecular subtypes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Article
  3. Ethnic genomic diversity in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comprehensive transcriptomic profiling and mutational landscape of primary gastric linitis plastica.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Peina DuBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Peide HuangBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Xuanlin HuangBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Xiangchun LiBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Zhimin FengBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Fengyu LiBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Shaoguang LiangBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Yongmei SongState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Institute and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Jan StenvangSection of Molecular Disease Biology, Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Nils BrünnerSection of Molecular Disease Biology, Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Huanming YangBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Yunwei OuDepartment of neurosurgery, Beijing tiantan hospital, capital medical university, Beijing, 100050, China.
Qiang GaoBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, China. gaoqiang@bgi.com.
Lin LiBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, China. lilin@bgi.com.
BGI Group (China) · CNBGI GenomicsUniversity of Copenhagen · DKBeijing Tian Tan Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oesophageal carcinoma is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in China, and more than 90% of these tumours are oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Although several ESCC genomic sequencing studies have identified mutated somatic genes, the number of samples in each study was relatively small, and the molecular basis of ESCC has not been fully elucidated. Here, we performed an integrated analysis of 490 tumours by combining the genomic data from 7 previous ESCC projects. We identified 18 significantly mutated genes (SMGs). PTEN, DCDC1 and CUL3 were first reported as SMGs in ESCC. Notably, the AJUBA mutations and mutational signature4 were significantly correlated with a poorer survival in patients with ESCC. Hierarchical clustering analysis of the copy number alteration (CNA) of cancer gene census (CGC) genes in ESCC patients revealed three subtypes, and subtype3 exhibited more CNAs and marked for worse prognosis compared with subtype2. Moreover, database annotation suggested that two significantly differential CNA genes (PIK3CA and FBXW7) between subtype3 and subtype2 may serve as therapeutic drug targets. This study has extended our knowledge of the genetic basis of ESCC and shed some light into the clinical relevance, which would help improve the therapy and prognosis of ESCC patients.

Indexed as

Databases, Nucleic AcidMutationCarcinoma, Squamous CellEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm ProteinsPrognosisNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29127303
PMCPMC5681595
OpenAlexW2767390968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.