ArticlePediatrics2017
Counseling on Sun Protection and Indoor Tanning.
Article in Pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- [A prospective randomized controlled study on the curative effects of enteral immunonutrition support therapy in adult burn patients at nutritional risk].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2022Trial
- Skin cancer primary prevention by counseling patients with different skin tones.Dermatology reports · 2023Article
- Sun Protection and Tanning Behaviors in Caregivers: Prevalence, Determinants, and Associations with Children's Behaviors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Skin cancer risk-reduction counseling with adolescents: Pediatrician perspectives.Psycho-oncology · 2020Article
- US Pediatrician Practices on Early Nutrition, Feeding, and Growth.Journal of nutrition education and behavior · 2020Article
- Clinical counseling on sun protection and indoor tanning avoidance: A survey of current practices among U.S. health care providers.Preventive medicine · 2019Article
- HPV vaccine recommendation profiles among a national network of pediatric practitioners: understanding contributors to parental vaccine hesitancy and acceptance.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2019Article
- Correlates of positive parental attitudes towards adolescent indoor tanning in the U.S.A.The British journal of dermatology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe US Preventive Services Task Force recommends clinical counseling for individuals ages 10 to 24 years to decrease skin cancer risk.
methodsA national, random sample of US American Academy of Pediatrics members practicing primary care in 2002 (response rate 55%) and 2015 (response rate 43%). Surveys explored attitudes and experiences regarding sun protection counseling; indoor tanning questions were added in 2015. χ
resultsMore pediatricians in 2015 (34%) than in 2002 (23%) reported discussing sun protection during recent summer months with ≥75% of patients. This pattern held across all patient age groups (each
conclusionsAlthough improved, sun protection counseling rates remain low. Indoor tanning counseling can be improved. Because early-life exposure to UV radiation increases risk and clinician counseling can positively impact prevention behaviors, pediatricians have an important role in skin cancer prevention; counseling may save lives. Time constraints remain a barrier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.