Trial reportThe lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology2018
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and autologous CD133-positive stem-cell therapy in liver cirrhosis (REALISTIC): an open-label, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial.
Trial report in The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
85 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 154 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of granulocyte colony stimulating factor in the treatment of cirrhosis of liver: a systematic review.The Journal of international medical research · 2023Pooled it
- Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without stem or progenitor cell or growth factors infusion for people with compensated or decompensated advanced chronic liver disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Therapeutic effect and safety of stem cell therapy for chronic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Stem cell research & therapy · 2020Pooled it
- Autologous macrophage therapy for liver cirrhosis: a phase 2 open-label randomized controlled trial.Nature medicine · 2025Trial
- Uncovering immune dysfunction in ACLF: Cellular mechanisms, molecular pathways, and therapeutic frontiers.Journal of hepatology · 2026Review
- How Physiology and Pharmacology Shape Liver Regeneration: From Molecules and Cells to Trials.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Safety and efficacy profile of S-005151 (Redasemtide), in patients with chronic liver diseases: phase 2 trial.Inflammation and regeneration · 2026Article
- Personalized Management of Cytopenias in Chronic Liver Disease: From Pathophysiology to Treatment Strategies.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Review
- Preclinical efficacy and safety evaluation of human embryonic stem cell-derived functional hepatocytes for a clinical trial in acute liver failure.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Article
- Beyond conventional treatments: cutting-edge strategies for ascites in cirrhosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Mechanisms, efficacy, and future perspectives of cellular-based therapies for liver fibrosis/cirrhosis: focusing on mesenchymal stromal cells.Cell & bioscience · 2025Review
- Stem cell therapy: a novel frontier in the treatment of liver fibrosis/cirrhosis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Treatment of liver cirrhosis using hepatocyte-derived liver progenitor-like cells: a prospective, open-label, single-arm, safety trial.Cell discovery · 2025Article
- Stem cells therapies for liver diseases: for current practice and future goals.Hepatology international · 2025Review
- Correlation between granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and the Notch signaling pathway in ischemic brain injury.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2025Article
- Safety and Effectiveness of Muse Cell Transplantation in a Large-Animal Model of Hepatic Fibrosis.Stem cells international · 2025Article
- Co-existing regeneration mechanisms in severe alcohol-related steatohepatitis.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- [Interventional studies on acute-on-chronic liver failure: challenges and opportunities].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2024Article
- Scaffold-free 3D culture systems for stem cell-based tissue regeneration.APL bioengineering · 2024Review
25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
22 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResults of small-scale studies have suggested that stem-cell therapy is safe and effective in patients with liver cirrhosis, but no adequately powered randomised controlled trials have been done. We assessed the safety and efficacy of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and haemopoietic stem-cell infusions in patients with liver cirrhosis.
methodsThis multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial was done in three UK hospitals and recruited patients with compensated liver cirrhosis and MELD scores of 11·0-15·5. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive standard care (control), treatment with subcutaneous G-CSF (lenograstim) 15 μg/kg for 5 days, or treatment with G-CSF for 5 days followed by leukapheresis and intravenous infusion of three doses of CD133-positive haemopoietic stem cells (0·2 × 10
findingsBetween May 18, 2010, and Feb 26, 2015, 27 patients were randomly assigned to the standard care, 26 to the G-CSF group, and 28 to the G-CSF plus stem-cell infusion group. Median change in MELD from day 0 to 90 was -0·5 (IQR -1·5 to 1·1) in the standard care group, -0·5 (-1·7 to 0·5) in the G-CSF group, and -0·5 (-1·3 to 1·0) in the G-CSF plus stem-cell infusion group. We found no evidence of differences between the treatment groups and control group in the trends of MELD change over time (p=0·55 for the G-CSF group vs standard care and p=0·75 for the G-CSF plus stem-cell infusion group vs standard care). Serious adverse events were more frequent the in G-CSF and stem-cell infusion group (12 [43%] patients) than in the G-CSF (three [11%] patients) and standard care (three [12%] patients) groups. The most common serious adverse events were ascites (two patients in the G-CSF group and two patients in the G-CSF plus stem-cell infusion group, one of whom was admitted to hospital with ascites twice), sepsis (four patients in the G-CSF plus stem-cell infusion group), and encephalopathy (three patients in the G-CSF plus stem-cell infusion group, one of whom was admitted to hospital with encephalopathy twice). Three patients died, including one in the standard care group (variceal bleed) and two in the G-CSF and stem-cell infusion group (one myocardial infarction and one progressive liver disease).
interpretationG-CSF with or without haemopoietic stem-cell infusion did not improve liver dysfunction or fibrosis and might be associated with increased frequency of adverse events compared with standard care.
fundingNational Institute of Health Research, The Sir Jules Thorn Charitable Trust.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.