Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29126446›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2017

Detection level and pattern of positive lesions using PSMA PET/CT for staging prior to radiation therapy.

Nina-Sophie Schmidt-Hegemann, Wolfgang Peter Fendler, Alexander Buchner, Christian Stief, Paul Rogowski, Maximilian Niyazi, Chukwuka Eze, Minglun Li, Peter Bartenstein, Claus Belka and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Metaanalysis ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Impact ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2020
    Trial
  4. Potential Impact ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2018
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Risk of metastatic disease using [EJNMMI research · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Phase I Study of CTT1057, anJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Clinical impact ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Article
  19. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nina-Sophie Schmidt-HegemannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Wolfgang Peter FendlerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alexander BuchnerDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christian StiefDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Paul RogowskiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Maximilian NiyaziDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Chukwuka EzeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Minglun LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Peter BartensteinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Claus BelkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ute GanswindtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. Ute.Ganswindt@med.uni-muenchen.de.
LMU Klinikum · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEInnsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo determine the potential role of

methodsOne hundred twenty-nine patients (pts) with

resultsOne hundred twenty-nine patients (pts) (20 at initial diagnosis, 49 with PSA relapse and 60 with PSA persistence after radical prostatectomy) received PSMA PET/CT prior to RT. The majority of pts. (71.3%) had PET-positive findings (55.1% of pts. with PSA recurrence, 75% of pts. with PSA persistence and 100% of newly diagnosed pts). Median PSA before PET/CT in pts. with pathological findings (n = 92) was 1.90 ng/ml and without (n = 37) 0.30 ng/ml. PSA level at time of PET/CT was the only factor associated with PET-positivity. In pts. with a PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/ml, the detection rate of any lesion was 33.3%, with a PSA of 0.21-0.5 ng/ml 41.2% and with a PSA of 0.51-1.0 ng/ml 69.2%, respectively. Regarding the anatomic distribution of lesions, 42.2% and 14.7% of pts. with relapse or persistence had pelvic lymph node and distant metastases. In pts. at initial diagnosis the detection rate of pelvic lymph nodes and distant metastases was 20% and 10%.

conclusionsThe detection of PCa is strongly associated with PSA level at time of

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, SurfaceDecision MakingGallium RadioisotopesGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenAntigens, SurfaceFOLH1 protein, humanGallium RadioisotopesGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIProstate-Specific AntigenRadiopharmaceuticals68Ga-PSMA PET/CTProstate cancerRadical prostatectomyRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID29126446
PMCPMC5681820
OpenAlexW2767599185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.