Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29126428›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2017

Validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the Organizational Readiness for Knowledge Translation (OR4KT) questionnaire.

Gonzalo Grandes, Paola Bully, Catalina Martinez, Marie-Pierre Gagnon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Validation of an instrument to guide the implementation of strategies for mental health care in Colombia.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gonzalo GrandesPrimary Care Research Unit of Bizkaia, Basque Health Service-Osakidetza, Luis Power 18, 4a planta, E-48014, Bilbao, Spain. gonzalo.grandesodriozola@osakidetza.eus.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5217-6628
Paola BullyPrimary Care Research Unit of Bizkaia, Basque Health Service-Osakidetza, Luis Power 18, 4a planta, E-48014, Bilbao, Spain.
Catalina MartinezPrimary Care Research Unit of Bizkaia, Basque Health Service-Osakidetza, Luis Power 18, 4a planta, E-48014, Bilbao, Spain.
Marie-Pierre GagnonPopulation Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, QC, Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Basque Government · ESThe Quebec Population Health Research Network · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) 200710CRI-179929-CRI-ADYP-112841Health Department of the Basque Government 2014111076Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI12/02113Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI13/00573Spanish Primary Care Research Network RD12/0005/0010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrganizational readiness to change healthcare practice is a major determinant of successful implementation of evidence-based interventions. However, we lack of comprehensive, valid, and reliable instruments to measure it. We assessed the validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the Organizational Readiness for Knowledge Translation (OR4KT) questionnaire in the context of the implementation of the Prescribe Vida Saludable III project, which seeks to strengthen health promotion and chronic disease prevention in primary healthcare organizations of the Osakidetza (Basque Health Service, Spain).

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted including 127 professionals from 20 primary care centers within Osakidetza. They filled in the OR4KT questionnaire twice in a 15- to 30-day period to test repeatability. In addition, we used the Survey of Organizational Attributes for Primary Care (SOAPC) and we documented the number of healthcare professionals who formally engaged in the Prescribe Vida Saludable III project within each participating center to assess concurrent validity.

resultsCronbach's alpha for the overall OR4KT was .95, and the overall repeatability coefficient was 6.95%, both excellent results. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the underlying theoretical structure of 6 dimensions and 23 sub-dimensions. There were positive moderate-to-high internal correlations between these six dimensions, and there was evidence of good concurrent validity (correlation coefficient of .76 with SOAPC, and .80 with the proportion of professionals engaged by center). A score higher than 64 (out of 100) would be indicative of an organization with high level of readiness to implement the intervention (sensitivity = .75, specificity = 1).

conclusionsThe Spanish version of the OR4KT exhibits very strong reliability and good validity, although it needs to be validated in a larger sample and in different implementation contexts.

Indexed as

Organizational InnovationAdultAgedChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesEnvironmentFemaleHealth PromotionHealth Services ResearchHumansLeadershipMaleMiddle AgedModels, PsychologicalMotivationPrimary Health CareHealthy lifestyleImplementationKnowledge translationOR4KTOrganizational readiness to changePrimary health carePsychometric properties

Identifiers

PMID29126428
PMCPMC5681775
OpenAlexW2767408678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.