Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29126412›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2017

Obstetric fistulae in southern Mozambique: incidence, obstetric characteristics and treatment.

Sibone Mocumbi, Claudia Hanson, Ulf Högberg, Helena Boene, Peter von Dadelszen, Anna Bergström, Khátia Munguambe, Esperança Sevene, CLIP working group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Sibone MocumbiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane (UEM), Av. Agostinho Neto 679, 1100, Maputo, Mozambique. sibone.mocumbi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2475-2560
Claudia HansonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavagen 18A, Plan 4, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ulf HögbergDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Akademiska sjukhuset, SE-75185, Uppsala, Sweden.
Helena BoeneCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Rua 12, Vila da Manhiça, 1121, Manhiça, Mozambique.
Peter von DadelszenGlobal Women's Health, King's College, London, UK.
Anna BergströmDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Akademiska sjukhuset, SE-75185, Uppsala, Sweden.
Khátia MunguambeCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Rua 12, Vila da Manhiça, 1121, Manhiça, Mozambique.
Esperança SeveneCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Rua 12, Vila da Manhiça, 1121, Manhiça, Mozambique.
CLIP working group
Uppsala University · SEUppsala University Hospital · SEDepartment of Physiological Sciences · RUKing's College London · GBManhiça Health Research Centre · MZ

Funding

2011-002102 51140011Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObstetric fistula is one of the most devastating consequences of unmet needs in obstetric services. Systematic reviews suggest that the pooled incidence of fistulae in community-based studies is 0.09 per 1000 recently pregnant women; however, as facility delivery is increasing, for the most part, in Africa, incidence of fistula should decrease. Few population-based studies on fistulae have been undertaken in Sub-Saharan Africa, including Mozambique. This study aimed to estimate the incidence of obstetric fistulae in recently delivered mothers, and to describe the clinical characteristics and care, as well as the outcome, after surgical repair.

methodsWe selected women who had delivered up to 12 months before the start of the study (June, 1st 2016). They were part of a cohort of women of reproductive age (12-49 years), recruited from selected clusters in rural areas of Maputo and Gaza provinces, Southern Mozambique, who were participating in an intervention trial (the Community Level Interventions for Pre-eclampsia trial or CLIP trial). Case identification was completed by self-reported constant urine leakage and was confirmed by clinical assessment. Women who had confirmed obstetric fistulae were referred for surgical repair. Data were entered into a REDCap database and analysed using R software.

resultsFive women with obstetric fistulae were detected among 4358 interviewed, giving an incidence of 1.1 per 1000 recently pregnant women (95% CI 2.16-0.14). All but one had Caesarean section and all of the babies died. Four were stillborn, and one died very soon after birth. All of the patients identified and reached the primary health facility in reasonable time. Delays occurred in the care: in diagnosis of obstructed labour, and in the decision to refer to the secondary or third-level hospital. All but one of the women were referred to surgical repair and the fistulae successfully closed.

conclusionThis population-based study reports a high incidence of obstetric fistulae in an area with high numbers of facility births. Few first and second delays in reaching care, but many third delays in receiving care, were identified. This raises concerns for quality of care.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedMozambiqueObstetric Labor ComplicationsPregnancyRectovaginal FistulaRural HealthVesicovaginal FistulaYoung AdultCaesareanIncidenceObstetric fistulaPopulation-basedSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID29126412
PMCPMC5681779
OpenAlexW2767556385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.